"""Your theory is saying that "people in a lower class have to be sacrifice in order to the keep up the demand and sales for the market""""
are you just refer yourself as lower class and talking about your own story.
when did i say that? I said "but if i don't buy the ipad, i don't need to buy anything else."
it means i don't have to buy any replacement product, but i can buy anything else i want. but i can buy a house, diamond ring or ...., or simply i just keep the money in my bank account. there is nothing to deal with "sacrifice". also refer to your first theory, if i don't buy any electric item, the workers who work with electrical diverse will loss their jobs.
"""the ipad and the company's goodwill will decrease and suffer from loss in long-term. but if the manufacturer set up a better policy and welfare for the workers, then the company will gain a goodwill back and earn more in the future"""
is it a bigger joke, or you just live in your fairytale. you are missing lot of steps.
if the company just need to set up a better policy(i believe you mean a budget control or anyway whatever) and welfare the workers will automatically gain back the goodwill and earn more in the future. then gm, ford, nortel and .... will not in trouble la. cutting cost will only limit the deficit in a short term, because fixed expenses cannot change. if you can't gain back the market, shareholders will still leave you, finance costs will still increase.
if you are right, then all the countries in Northern Europe should collapse cuz they are everyone there are nearly equal.
back to econ101, you forgot the import/export , service industry and raw material. if the country has nothing, it will probably follow iceland soon.
you are using too many assumptions in your statements without quote. i shouldn't say anything about econ 101, because your level is far below that. |