I think, there is no point to discuss before 97 or after 97.. the past. We can argue like this for many many many years without conclusion, until we died. and hundreds years later, historian will give us the answer in their time with their point of view.
The most important things are
1) 社民連激進抗爭手法 -- how 激進? what is your definition of 激進?
2) what's wrong with HK government now? in both legistration & administration
3) What should the HK governement be better? How can it be funtionally serving general public? Not only for the rich or middle class, but also for root grass & minorities.
so, we need to understand the problems, the cause of problems, then the vision, blue-print & the solution.
I agree that HK lack of democracy is part of but not entire the root of all problems. I believe the "work" attitude of the HK administration government pays a major part too. and other many factors.
to solve this, democracy may be part of the solution but not all again.
I believe, the government has to really really really put "people" in their heart, not their mouth to look at all problems. |
發表於 2009-4-3 10:12
| 