Lik

No constitutional / political reforms can be made at all, since the cripple procedure requires Grandfather to pre-approve any proposal and subsequently review it again before it can be enacted. Politically, HK's future is dead.

- revive the construction of 居屋 and expand 公屋 programs
- repurchase / nationalize the various underwater tunnels
- halt the high speed rail project and order a full review on site location, environment impact, traffic and logistic impact, etc. This will most certain piss Grandfather off.
- re-purchase the administration / operations right of 領匯
- infuse sizable sums into the public healthcare programs and elderly support programs
- put some real efforts into re-starting athletic training programs. But this must be done in conjunction with educational reforms that focus less on exams and more on overall children development
- produce a real 國情教育 program that talks about true Chinese history instead of only focusing on the success of the CCP
- make a high profile appearance in attending the 6.4 memorial in support of it

These are just a few selected topics that I have immediately off the top of my head. I'm sure I can come up with way more if I put some thoughts into it.

-Lik

Lik

2. diversity HK's industries
randommike 發表於 2011-7-17 21:01

This is difficult because traditionally, HK's strength lies in its finance sector and in its well-established judiciary system. To a lesser extend, knowledge-based industries might also stand a good chance of succeeding, any manufacturing related to this knowledge-based industries would have to be moved elsewhere (most likely SE China). But at that point, you run the risk of having the item copied.

With limited space, it is difficult for a lot of industries to develop.

Did you have something a little more specific in mind?

-Lik

Lik

Three things come into my mind.

1)        Establishing the road map for getting rid of functional groups and realizing general election in 10 ~ 15 years. Some people will think it takes too long. For me, it is an acceptable time frame.
rockypath 發表於 2011-7-17 21:47

BS. The 10 year phase out period of functional constituencies is already in the work, and the plan already been criticized to shreds, and your retarded plan takes even longer than the current proposal. Why put up with functional constituency for up another 15 years when they already serve the general public zero purpose? At the moment, their sole purpose of existence is to serve those who already receive major benefits from government policies and continue to protect their interests.

2)        Establishing a system to provide affordable housing to HK citizens with the injunction of creating new economies (or diversifying HK industries). I will not support it if the policy is implemented solely.

Why does the two need to be tied? Associating the two together serves no real purpose.

b)        Restricting foreign hot money to flow into real estate market and limit foreigners’ purchasing of HK real estate (HK government may not want to do this since it will damage HK’s reputation as an international metropolis and a free market)

Depending on how it is done, this is not necessarily a bad policy. I don't like the term "restrict" because it implies government control, but if it is simply done in terms of some sort of percentage-based levy / tax based on transaction values, then I can see it being viable.

c)        Increase land supplies strictly for affordable housing projects

Commercial developers will not have too much interest in this because there is far less money to be made. What the government could do is to borrow a page out of the US gov in their CAFE ratings, and require developers to build a minimum number of affordable housing projects for every certain number of luxury projects. That way, legislation will ensure there are enough affordable housing units around.

3)        Invest in developing new economies and set up policies to attract investments both domestically and internationally into these new industries. (Singapore is doing pretty good at it. Many HK people worry about Shanghai is taking over HK as a world finance center. In my opinion, I would rather watch out for Singapore instead of Shanghai.) Establish systems to get average worker Joe to be retrained so that they can get a higher pay job in those new industries.

Since the LMD years, the SAR government has continually been trying to do this and the result has been crystal clear to everyone. All the talk of different industries only resulted in mega real estate projects that only made the big developers even more wealthy. So how do you intend to be different? Last but not least, re-training is no easy feat, and there will always be those who can't made the grade. How do you intend to help them?

-Lik

Lik

If I am 特首, 係咁既制度, 權力係由北京授權, 出糧係市民, 立法會泛民唔可以親近(因阿爺唔LIKE), 建制隨時 ...
rainbow-davie 發表於 2011-7-17 22:48

你呢個做法，其實同當奴完全無分別，一樣幫唔到香港人。講得好聽就係社會和諧，講得唔好聽，就係縮骨兼乜撚正經野都唔做。

一開始我就已經講，特首要做任何憲法、政制嘅事其實都無能力，因為做乜都要通過5步曲來等阿爺批完再批，而阿爺就一定唔會俾你香港搞自由民主野。阿爺一直嘅做法都係一路拖，一路不斷泵人來同化你，到時你就自己不攻自破。所以香港人（包括特首）最應該做嘅就係頂住阿爺，保住香港本土意識，再 inspire 內地，接辛亥革命之時「國家顛覆基地」嘅重任令到內地嘅民主自由意識深入民心。

#3)        The details of policies of increasing land supplies for affordable housing is beyond my capabilities of discussion. I don’t know what will work or will not work in Hong Kong.

即係響度狗up啦～

#4)        Ask yourself this question – does the failure of trying to developing new industries conclude it is a wrong idea or it is a right idea but was wrongly executed? Singapore has been taking this direction. Are they stupid? (btw, I am suspicious whether you are confused by the word – “industry”. Manufacturing is only a type of industries. Filming is also an industry, for example.)

老董當年當然係做得衰，而我當然知道工業並唔代表製造業，製造業只係其中一個 example。但實際上要搞新工業有好大難度。

講過好多次，香港嘅強項係智識型經濟，而且人工比鄰近地方貴，所以人工方面已經輸蝕咗一截。而且香港人整體搵錢嘅心態比較急功近利同短視，一心最想亦最鍾意搵快錢，長線嘅投資比較難做得成。呢樣野係香港人性格上嘅缺陷，本性嘅野好難改。

響西方世界，要拓展新工業其實通常都係靠人民自己嘅創意來 think out of the box，去做啲新嘅，以前無人做過嘅野。但香港人雖然話頭醒尾轉數快，而且創意唔係無，但就通常都用晒落去啲小聰明嘅事之上。但目前來講，就算你只係想租個舖來搞野，淨係交租都交死你。想去租工廈來搞咩？做咗少則三幾個月，長則一兩年，之後政府又走來搞你話要地區重建，趕走晒社區原本嘅人，起好新地方之後就只係益晒發展商。咁你新工業又去做屁咩？

就係咁，所以我先至話響香港要搞新工業難。人地新加坡個政府就真係強政勵治，重要識得吸晒啲精英入局去為國家做野喇～ 香港政府入面嘅精英？有料如毓民、民主余女神等等就俾人打壓同設局來牽制，而本來回歸前全世界最有效率嘅公務員班子就經過15年嘅催殘而搞到得返個英年早逝條條Fing之流來領導，咁又有乜鬼野精英？有都去咗自己搵水啦？仲要幫你政府搞工業喎？

-力

Lik

回復  Lik

Shameless idiot mad dog Lik,

Did you find out what Singapore has been doing?  Show us  ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-7-18 10:38

仆街，

例子係你指出來嘅。點解要我幫你做埋功課？

餐餐都係咁，無啲長進～

-力

Lik

狗up？你估我係你呀？舉埋例子俾你去查證，教埋你方法㗎喇，係你自己無料到，一味齋吹水～

連出 post 嘅 format 都要抄埋我，你都真係折墮囉～

-力

Lik

癲狗力，你估我係你呀？舉埋例子俾你去查證，教埋你方法㗎喇，係你自己無料到，一味齋吹水～

連功課都唔 ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-7-18 13:35

仆街，

連字都懶打就唔該你咪撚出 post 啦～

-力

Lik

it's worst than "just talk, no action" ... they can't even talk properly ...
daimo 發表於 2011-7-18 20:45

同啲撚人有乜撚野好講？

-力

Lik

又係一个 悲劇英雄 ！
老友四號 發表於 2011-7-18 23:53

老董都好勉強可以算佢係悲劇英雄，因為最少佢老人家都真係有個心想為香港好，只不過佢個人實在係太蠢，而且仲要啱啱預着沙士、禽流、亞洲金融風暴，真係神仙都未必有計...

但Bowtie就擺到明又串又無料、又要威又要戴頭盔。好喇，到家陣真係唔掂喇，就一味淨係識得龜縮。佢配做英雄？做食屎狗雄都唔配啦～

-力

Lik

食得鹹魚抵得渴，做得下任特首就預咗俾人diu到屁股開花㗎啦？唔通出賣咗自己嘅良知，做咗阿爺隻走狗、傀儡之後仲諗住自己可以留芳百世咩？

-力