天朝再爆列車追尾：上海地鐵列車追撞260人傷 上海, 新天地, 南京

Lik

http://inews.mingpao.com/htm/inews/20110927/ca21732a.htm

上海地鐵追撞260人傷 (17:35)

上海地鐵10號線下午2時許發生列車追尾碰撞意外，當地傳媒報道，受傷人數增至260人，已疏散所有乘客。

上海地鐵表示，今日下午2時10分，上海地鐵10號線新天地站設備故障，交通大學至南京東路上下行列車限速運行。在2時51分，在10號線豫園至老西門下行區間，兩列車不慎追尾相撞，260名乘客受傷。救援人員已疏散兩列車上的500多名乘客。

據乘客稱，事發時層聽到「砰」一聲巨響，隨後車輛急煞車，由於慣性很多乘客摔倒，有乘客受傷。當局在發生意外後，封閉該地鐵站，並將所有列車改為人手操作，令行車時間延長。據出事列車乘客上載微博的相片可見，有很多乘客倒地，頭部被撞至流血。

一位正在事發10號線列車上的乘客徐小姐指出，她所在的列車已經在隧道內停留了將近一個小時，在停車前曾經有過急煞車。她試圖透過車窗玻璃向外觀察，據她所見，車頭車尾方向均沒有其他列車。


肇事的其中一列地鐵的車頭。


上海地鐵10號線下午2時許發生列車追尾碰撞意外，當地傳媒報道，受傷人數增至260人，已疏散所有乘客。

Lik

天朝嘅鐵路有幾安全，大家有眼見。他日呢個禍端申延到香港，有乜野後果，大家都可以想像得到。

-力

Lik

Hope no one gets hurt seriously...

BTW, anyone knows what's the reason for this accident this time? ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-9-27 10:40

According to the video, it was another problem with the signalling system again. Coincidentally, this Shanghai subway signal system is written by the same company that wrote up the Wenzhou powered cars system. Of course we all know what happened in that one la.

Incidentally, the HK-SZ "high speed" rail is supposed to use the same signalling system that is written by this same company as well, which is why I said in my previous post that we can almost expect what is going to come to HK when the HK-SZ line runs.

-Lik

Lik

回復  Lik

According to their preliminary inspection last time, the officials were saying that the system is damaged by the flash... What are they going to tell this time?
lo_pak 發表於 2011-9-27 11:09

Do you actually buy that bs story though? Even if it were true, the very fact that all the signal lights turned green (instead of red, as in the usual worldwide standard) is enough to tell everyone that the system designers were so bun 7 to the point that they are utterly incompetent.

And is Shanghai gonna try and pull the same trick again? That the underground subway still got struck by lightning a whole bunch of times, which is why the system failed?

-Lik

Lik

俾多少少時間同奈性，我敢寫包單一定攪得惦！
fy789 發表於 2011-9-27 21:44

仆街啦你。俾多啲時間同耐性？你等緊佢攪果陣仲要死傷多幾多個人？

地鐵行得慢、路程短都仲話可以全面人手操控。咁高鐵呢？一秒行幾廿米，但個signal根本就未整好，咁唔係莽顧人命，而且仲要係乘客嘅命，仲可以係乜野？！

-力

Lik

條仆街唔借機轉移視線去貪污問題，然後再拖埋其他國家落水來搏做 damage control嘅話，仲可以點樣幫阿爺兜？呢啲賤種係咁撚樣㗎啦？

-力

Lik

Failures are daily rituals in R&D activities.

Please don't do R&D and inventions if one is afraid ...
fy789 發表於 2011-9-27 23:28

仆街，

有人坐嘅鐵路唔係俾你攞來做R＆D，而人命傷亡更唔係俾你阿爺攞來玩或者出風頭、爭面子。你軟件、硬件根本都未做好，夾硬要用咪即係攞人命來校飛？！

-力

Lik

你唔係無知既, 我相信你一定明白我講緊乜.
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2011-9-27 23:57

條仆街唔係無知，只不過係無恥嗟！

我唔明點解力兄你成日覺得阿爺好鍾意攞人民來玩或者出風頭, 爭面子. 我更唔明一個完善既鐵路系統對中國有乜野唔好. 而家好明顯有d 野係唔完善, 諗計切掂佢law, 係唔係想成個鐵路系統打柴先開心丫?
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2011-9-28 00:02

阿爺好大喜功係人所共知嘅事，我根本無須要同你坳呢樣野。而攞人民條命來校飛係客觀嘅事實判斷。正如Satil兄所講，豆腐渣、黑心食品、貪腐問題等等，每一件事都不斷話俾我地聽只要唔影響到佢政權嘅話，阿爺根本對人命有否傷亡毫不關心。

一個完善既鐵路系統對中國自然係好，但好明顯，家陣嘅鐵路唔完善不特止，連最基本嘅安全標準都做唔到。除咗譴責佢、diu柒佢、令到佢有咁樣衰得咁樣衰之外，你仲可以做乜野？因為話到尾，阿爺就係最要面子。響全世界面前丟架，阿爺先至可能會做返多少野。

-力

Lik

而且中國實在太多人, 俗d 講真係多一個唔多, 少一個唔少
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2011-9-28 00:45

就憑你講得出呢句說話，我地就可以睇到你對生命有幾咁唔尊重。如果真係多一個唔多、少一個唔少嘅話，點解你唔第一個死撚咗佢？

我呢句其實可以再講得惡毒好多，不過我唔係好似你咁，因為我尊重生命。

-力

Lik

Of course there is a serious design flaw la, bun 7. What train signalling system in the world would default everything to green light when there is a system failure? 咁撚勁嘅設計，真係只有天朝先至做得到！

-Lik