Lik

Can't blame corporations for '賺到盡'. If the real estate sales practices are deemed unfair, and perhaps anti-competitive, maybe something should be done in terms of policies?

"商界的政治特權、立法會功能組別、不公平售樓手法" should be addressed by policies and law. Telling businesses to not make profit and care for the society instead counters the purpose of their existence, doesn't it?
BiscottiGelato 發表於 2010-9-15 15:28

The problem is, there is no democracy in Hong Kong -- the current game is simply controlled by the tycoon-government-Grandfather bloc. Until full democracy is achieved, there is no chance for the current practices to be broken up via government policy. But given all the links and associations and relationships that exist between the rich tycoons and those in the government, why would they ever want to give up their exclusive benefits?

This is why LSD continue to take up their fights and protests both from within the legislature and out there on the streets.

-Lik

Lik

Total BS la, MJJ.

The Pigeon Party has already been assimilated into Grandfather's camp. What more can they do other than further selling Hong Kong democracy out? The Lawyer's Party will only seek their gentlemanly protests within the confines of the rules, but these rules were set out by the Establishment to be unfair in the first place.

-Lik

Lik

DP and Civic Party also continue to take up their fights and protests both from within the legislature and out there on the streets...

Lik, 你只懂美化你既社民連, 而去抹煞其他為香港民主出力既人, 始乃掛除異己, 對香港既民主進程毫無裨益! 來吧, 我們一同手牽手, 心連心, 全心全力去為香港既民主打拼吧~
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2010-9-15 22:16

If what you claim is true, why can I not find a single example in the last few years when the Pigeon and Lawyer Parties stood up for democracy and challenge the government head on? Unlike you naive self, calling a few party lines at demonstrations, and going home afterwards to enjoy their air-conditioned office doesn't cut it in my books.

-Lik