返回列表 發帖
Coward Lik.

You never had the gut to answer my questions directly and I give you one more chance to do so.

First, do you admit there is a difference between the democracy in western countries and other countries around the world in terms of "effectiveness" and "efficiency"?

Second, tell us the reasons why those differences exist? If you do not see there is any difference in term of "effectiveness" and "efficiency", then also tell us the reasons why you believe so.

Let's see whether you have the gut to face the reality. But I would have a doubt.
rockypath 發表於 2011-4-18 21:53

Moron,

Stop wasting my time. Your stupid lead-in questions are not going to work on me because I just see right through them. And lemme remind you, your second question is poorly worded because it assumes I would feed you the answer that you've pre-determined, and that is simply just wrong.

In page 5, post #45, I have already given you examples of how Southern American countries such as Argentina, Chile, Venezuela, Brazil, and Costa Rica are non-western countries that have sufficiently effective and efficient democracies, thereby defeating your entirely false premise that democracy only works in rich, western countries. I even quoted the Republic of China as the closest example to what Mainland China can ever hope to achieve, as it is yet another effective democracy. And yet despite all this evidence, you have continued to refused to accept that your assumption is incorrect, and that you have already lost your argument.

None of the democracies I mentioned are perfect. In fact, democracy is far from perfect even in your so-called effective and efficient western countries. But as Winston Churchill has said, democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.

I don't see any point in wasting my valuable time on the little piece of turd that you are. But I will say that for all its faults and inefficiencies, the Republic of China is a sufficiently mature democracy. From the time when KMT fled to Taiwan until the first signs of democracy appeared, it only took ROC a mere 30-something years. 作為中華民國第六屆總統,蔣經國有呢個見識同擔當去講「時代在變、潮流在變、環境在變」,然後講完之後嘅第二年臺灣就解除黨禁,而民進黨亦正式成為中華民國嘅第一個反對黨。我地中國大陸嘅溫家寶影帝近年(舊年?)亦響出國訪問嘅時候講過啲相類似嘅說話,話咩「民主潮流,順者倡 逆者忙」之類。但就憑佢堂堂總理之身,呢句說話講完之後卻係完全無被任何媒體響中國大陸裡面報導,而解除黨禁、報禁之類就更加唔使指意!

誰高誰低,顯而易見!

-Lik

TOP

I would say China current governing system is prttey effective and efficient to the fact of China's current political and economic situation, legal structure and general education level. As we can see, living standard, international influence, human right and pulitical feedom has been improved compare to 30 and 50 years ago.
rockypath 發表於 2011-4-19 11:33

原來對你來講,由文革比人鬥臭、殺死轉變為只係比共慘黨無敵剝削、侵權、被失蹤、被和諧就已經係一個合格嘅大進步。

多謝你再一次承認你嘅無恥。

-力

TOP

I don't think the crisis for the mainland Chinese is lack of knowledge. It could be true in the past, but the fact is that the Chinese are becoming more and more educated. People in China are still being able to receive information from outside, and China is not as isolated as you thought. Not even to mention the number of Chinese tourists to overseas is rapidly growing every year.

I would take the crisis of value system (價值觀和道德觀) a more serious problem. I also agree this is 文革造成的後遺症.
rockypath 發表於 2011-4-25 13:55

多鳩餘啦你~ People in China can receive information from outside 嘅話,你中國就有得玩 Facebook、上 YouTube、唔會有敏感詞啦~

話你一味死幫阿爺撐又唔認...

-力

TOP

仆街,

你估淨係 FB 同 YouTube呀?中國大陸裡面有得上外國嘅新聞網站咩?我又唔見你講敏感詞呢個問題?

一日就淨係識得叫人搵 quote 來答你,我唔該你去用吓自己個腦啦?成世人都徵係識得用屎忽諗野~

-力

TOP

返回列表