Lik

Don't change the question. The question does not to ask you whether you should keep the old car or buy a new car.  

What if I tell you the option of buying a new car is not available because you cannot afford buying a new car? Will that make you lose the target of answering the question?  

Can you focus back to the original question again?
rockypath 發表於 2011-10-17 16:58

Hahahah~ Look at all this bs here~ Who is changing the question now, huh? Who? Answer me!!!

Seeing that your original question (and the associated suggestion that the opportunity cost of getting rid of the CPP is too high) has been completely crushed by my reply, you are now trying to weasel out of admitting the fact that you have been proven wrong and thoroughly humiliated in the process. So now you are employing your usual tactic and try to shift focus to another thing. As if I am going to fall for that?

I have proven my point and will not waste any additional time on you and your worthless questions.

Go home and close skin la~

-Lik

Lik

Can you leave the CPP out for a moment? It has nothing to do with CPP here. It is just a discussio ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-10-17 17:31

呢條 thread 係講緊小悅悅點樣被啲無血性嘅天朝人撞親，然後仲要被人視而不見無人理。你響條thread度問得出嘅問題，我就會將佢同條 thread 嘅主題連埋一齊。你係想去問你啲低能 econ 101問題嘅話，唔該你開過第二條 thread。呢條 thread 講得嘅野都無可避免地會拉埋阿爺落水。

過主咪阻住個地球轉！

-力

Lik

As I have said many, many, many times, the root cause of such cruelty and lack of humanity in China is because of Murderous Mao. The continual ruling of the CCP has only intensified the degradation of humanity in China because under the CCP's power, nobody respects the law, nor does anyone believe in the judiciary system.  It is basically If you want to see an end to this, the CCP is the first thing that needs to go.

It is interesting to note that with the way things are going in China right now, the status quo is heading for collapse. Grandfather can either try to go along with the tides, or it can die trying as it puts up a futile fight.

-Lik

Lik

再說簡明一點。
你現在放棄車子賣掉，可能得到原來的一半價錢，加上來年的維修預算，你將有自由去選擇將來的代步方法。這當比車子在不順風的日子特然解體血本無歸好。
當然，選擇結果會有對有錯，但擁有選擇權本身，永遠是個恩賜。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2011-10-17 18:24

講得無錯。

可恨嘅係，偏偏中國就太多人受愚家思想嘅毒害，甘願做奴才去服侍主子都唔想自己當家作主。又有太多人依然一心只求明君，而唔明白完善嘅制度先至能夠為社會帶來長治久安。

-力

Lik

內地有部份嘅人仲話，幫手救悅悅嘅果位拾荒婆婆肯去救人係因為想搏出位、搏名聲。聽完，我真係小狗佢懶刷鞋！！！家陣係救緊條人命呀，仲要係個得兩歲嘅小妹妹。話人地想搏出位咁賤格嘅說話都講得出，呢啲仲係人來嘅？！

-力

Lik

These things happen every where. If it happens every where, then the blame should not put on the gov ...
peter236 發表於 2011-10-17 21:29

收皮啦你～除咗天朝之外，仲有邊度可以有18個人見到個成身血嘅小妹妹瞓響地下典來典去都照樣掂行掂過？！到有人終於救佢，仲要話人地個阿婆搏出位！

呢啲咁嘅人渣，真係唔死都無用啦！

-力

Lik

網上睇見呢副相，真係成個心都up晒。一方面為狗狗心痛，但另一方面，我睇見狗狗見到同伴嘅屍體瞓咗響路上嘅時候，佢都知道要推、要拉開條屍，等同伴嘅遺體唔會被汽車輾過、被糟蹋。但18個冷血嘅人，見到悅悅成身血咁瞓響地吓呻吟、典來典去，佢地都可以視若無睹...

我諗到嘅，又豈止係人不如狗咁簡單？

-力