返回列表 發帖
除左一個人犯法﹐要坐監﹐就會喪失呢D基本權利。但係香港又接受呢個變性人批准以女性身份做香港居民﹐而呢位W小姐又無犯法﹐點解無啦啦會失去結婚呢個基本人權呢?
大C姐 發表於 2010-10-5 17:33



    有冇聽書?
法官判
性別嘅訂定
係佢出世嗰陣時
係男定係女
唔係變咗係乜就係乜
知冇

TOP

Rather not to argue whether 變性人 (no matter gal to guy or guy to gal) can get married or not, but  ...
FiChai 發表於 2010-10-6 01:09


我諗
而家嗰法官係解釋僅
婚姻 同 夫妻 嘅定義
婚姻係容許有同性和異性
但係夫妻 係 男女嘅關係
你出世紙上嘅性別
就係你完本係嘅

法官係去解釋 去施法
唔係 去立法

TOP

去施法? ma lee ma lee home? hahaha...
匿名 發表於 2010-10-6 07:58



    playingtoy 上身

TOP

Then I should say, any executive person executes ridiculous laws so a ridiculous result came out. N ...
FiChai 發表於 2010-10-6 11:30


wrong logic

TOP

Law is a law, if you find it rediculous, try to change it.
無知並不是罪﹐  真正的罪是以無知 為口頭禪 為榮

TOP

Wrong logic.
Things need to be balanced out and both devil and angel sides have their ways to survive. In a sense, try to make everything perfect is truly ridiculous. LOL
FiChai 發表於 2010-10-6 19:13


so, even you think this law is ridiculous, and you still think that both devel and angel sides have to survive. then it is good for the evil

TOP

返回列表