MoiRhapsody

I don't who are the "HKers in these forum".  My name is blue20AE (in this forum) and I am a Canadian ...
blue20ae 發表於 2011-6-21 21:46

    喎系順德人來嘩~

MoiRhapsody

...... Both intel and AMD are x86 core.......
AMD needs to buy license from intel to product x86-64 .....

MoiRhapsody

五毛分散注意力實在太利害～！
重申論點：
如果AMD同Intel雖然共用X86 ISA但唔可以叫做「同一款」晶片，點解用同一系列既ISA既晶片會俾peter話係american晶片呢？
咁點解Fujitsu塊SPARC 64 VIIIfx會係”rely on SPARC, an American design.“(quote from peter)
同一時間loongson 3又係 base on MIPS 64,但係loongson又唔會係”rely on MIPS, an American design."呢？？

MoiRhapsody

回復 101# lo_pak


    If I believe can I have 5cents?

MoiRhapsody

do you have NEW POINT???
your argument is invaild，using SPARC means NOT OWN CPU design, but using MIPS is CHINESE OWN DESIGN??

MoiRhapsody

then you ****ing get the wrong concept too.
Fujitsu architecture is different from Oracle's even though both support SPARC instructions
are you saying Fujitsu people just sit there and do nothing?

MoiRhapsody

your IPA BASHER IS invaild!!

MoiRhapsody

Then Peter can you explain why you discredit fujitsu Researcher using the same theory ?

MoiRhapsody

stupid.
CT paid to use MIPS 32 and 64,
This shows CT has no CPU design capability.
no different then Fujitsu.
YOU MORON!

MoiRhapsody

YOU ARE MORON
IF USING OTHER COMPANY ISA = no CPU design capability
THEN CT USING MIPS = no CPU design capability ALSO!
LOOK AT WHAT YOU SAID IN POST #11

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-6-20 16:07 編輯

'K' use 68,544 pcs SPARC 64 VIIIfx processor. It is made by Fujitsu Laboratories Ltd. (base on Sun M ...
satil 發表於 2011-6-20 15:31


In other words, the Japanese don't know how to design their own CPUs, but still rely on SPARC, an American design.

YOU DISCREDIT FUJITSU RESEARCHER FOR THEIR WORK, YOU CHINESE BLIND SUPPORTER BASH THE OTHER WITH SILLY THEORY THAT PROVE YOURSELF INferior too.