Look4chrisng

我也不是在跟你討論是否有神。我只是想知道你如何證明“無神”是客觀事實。

在“無神”與“有神”都不能 ...
rockypath 發表於 2012-11-25 23:53

我也不是在跟你討論是否有神。我只是想知道你如何證明“無神”是客觀事實。
You can't prove negative.  That is Philosophy 101.  By default, you cannot find evidence to prove non-existence.
在“無神”與“有神”都不能獨立被證明的情況下，這兩個都是理論而不是事實。
No, the burden of prove resides with those saying "God exists."  If God exists, then you can find evidence of its existence.  
It is the same as a murder trial, absent of evidence of "not guilty" can not be taken as evidence of guilty. Same logic here.

如果你堅持“無神”是事實而不需要去證明，
Same logic, absent of God can't be a fact either.  It remains a known unknown or an unknown unknown, rather than a known known.

那你與其它有宗教信仰的信徒沒有什麼本質上的區別- 都是將信心當成事實。
Not understand this statement. Please explain.  Who is other? and who is you?

At the end of the day, for most mortals, my practical guide is believe what your heart believes, and than don't give a damn about others.

Look4chrisng

回復 144# 大C姐


Agreed your statement.   But I just wanted to point out the flaw in logic of another user.

Whether or not God exists has little importance to most of us.  It is an non-issue.  But, what is relevant is religious (Please notice God and religious are two different things).

God is God, religious is human, and therefore it comes with all the flaws of human beings.  That is why, some treat Church is a place to sell Insurance or RRSP.

Look4chrisng

Worth watching.