Look4chrisng

who is to say what's right?
based on what?

something right for you might be wrong for others
so y ...
快樂牛郎 發表於 2011-1-16 23:47

Discriminating people based on something a person has no control is wrong. You can quote me on this one.

If we disallow dying people to choose where they can live.  We will need to disallow Chinese, women and ugly people  to choose

Would you want to go back to the days when Chinese people are not allowed to live in W. Van?

Look4chrisng

回復 75# 快樂牛郎

In a Hospice, there is no treatments for the disease, and no doctors on duty.  Part of the reason to have Hospice because it is a cost-saving measure.  With one nurse you can take care of 10+ patients.  (I think a doctor only comes 2 mornings within a week.)

These people just need a warm and quiet place to pass the last few days of their lives.   

It is sad if made every decisions based on property values.

Look4chrisng

I think it's sad that the government can just screw you over because they want to.
快樂牛郎 發表於 2011-1-17 10:39

Again, who is the who you are referring.

Look4chrisng

you forgot to include the cost of facility
快樂牛郎 發表於 2011-1-17 10:40

In fact, dying people costs less.  Because they no longer need resources when they died.

Since you are after the dollars and cents, yet you can't get your numbers straight?
There will be less facility to build, since Hospice free up spaces in Hospital.

Look4chrisng

what about they just die in their homes? even less resources
快樂牛郎 發表於 2011-1-17 11:04

NO.

Look4chrisng

i would like to see the calculations
快樂牛郎 發表於 2011-1-17 11:30

You are not interested in calculations. Let's leave it at that.  

Go back to discussions about why rangefinders are better then DSLR.

Look4chrisng

1k per person, 15k per mo.  Land stay in public domain doing public services.

If there is no cost benefit over any other ways, do you think our Gov would be interested?

And do you know how much it costs to have a person dead at home?