mcjohnjohn

死啦, 唔知點解, 我只係覺得個高官兒子係想走拍走記者部手機, 而唔係去傷人.
個記者太近影相喇, 高官兒子大可以以"自衛"去甩身. 有一個人舉起一舊黑色既野o係你身邊唔夠一米主動地出現, 足以令當事人感到安全受到威脅, 咁樣應該好易打得甩.
律政司唔告佢, 只係覺得贏面唔高, 唔想浪費納稅人既錢之麻. 慳番d 去補貼一下高鐵 & 五區補選仲好啦~

mcjohnjohn

wow good point, so anyone is holding a cellphone/camera/camcorder/remote control close to you, you will feel 安全受到威脅 and you can beat that person?  where can you go in hk ar?
tofu 發表於 2010-2-8 13:03

小弟真係唔覺高官兒子"打"記者, 條片係好明顯想撥走記者個相機, 咁同"打"人係好唔同. 總之就一定銼唔入佢架啦.
如果個記者o係遠d 既距離影相, 而高官兒子係行過去撥開個記者既相機既話, 咁都仲有機會有得打.

算把啦, 法律不嬲都係有錢人既玩意, 律政司明知告佢唔入, 唔通仲去浪費公帑咩.

mcjohnjohn

13# mcjohnjohn

呢啲係叫做冇品
無家教
sheep 發表於 2010-2-8 13:55

冇錯! 絕對係~
但係呢一隻冇家教o係法律上真係告佢唔入, 同埋呢個高官兒子真係唔係咁明顯想打人law.

mcjohnjohn

冇品, 無家教係一件事
係唔係暴力事件係另外一件事

呀 mcjohnjohn, 小心的呀﹐你夠膽反對個位港英力既意見﹐一陣間佢又化身紅衛兵
批鬥你﹐ 話你係狗架啦
chunsh 發表於 2010-2-8 14:07

我唔係話反對邊個, 我不嬲都係對事唔對人.
我只係表達我既意見, so far 都仲有言論自由. 當然, 如果咁都話我係狗, 我就有d 唔開心, 不過我都會尊重任何人既言論自由的~

mcjohnjohn

15# mcjohnjohn

佢老豆姓施
撕毀然？
前律政施
怪唔得咁把炮
拉你兼告你
老豆老母齊撐你
sheep 發表於 2010-2-8 14:13

嬲嬲地, 仲可以反過黎咬你一啖, 反告個記者意圖人身攻擊...

mcjohnjohn

如果個記者o係遠d 既距離影相, 而高官兒子係行過去撥開個記者既相機既話, 咁都仲有機會有得打.

i do believe 贏面唔高, buti just feel your point is kind of funny.  also, no matter he is 打記者or 撥開個記者既相機, as long as the reporter gets hurt, he will be sued.  the reporter was not blocking his way, so there was no excuse for him to 撥開 the reporter or the reporter's belongs.   the judge will look at both intention and result.
總之就一定銼唔入佢架啦.?  who knows? you got the llp?
tofu 發表於 2010-2-9 06:19

小弟覺得, 律政司絕對唔應該花呢d 錢去打呢d 咁既冇贏面既官司 (因為刑事案既控方就係律政司). 你覺得funny, 我覺得好正常, 可能你唔係生活o係一個"法治之都"...
當然, 如果記者個梳機花左or 爛左, 個記者可以民事索償, 小弟覺得呢個case 就贏面甚高~

"總之就一定銼唔入佢架啦.?  who knows? you got the llp?" - 你去問下黃仁龍, 睇下佢答唔答你law. 不如你幫個記者搵個律師去告高官兒子啦, 去維護正義啦, 小弟絕對支持!