返回列表 發帖
本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-8-21 18:02 編輯
一直讚高鐵讚到上天嘅 Peter仔呢?一直支持起高鐵嘅FY同Rocky呢?點解全部死撚散唔知去邊度?

-力 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-8-21 17:09


Fuxking mad dog Lik,

You just won't stop wasting my time. Educating you is not my obligation and it is your parents' job.

The need of high-speed railway networks and the mechanical/design flaw are absolutely independent issues. How many people had died for the development of aero-transportation? Why did we not see you ever bash the airplane you have been taking?

The fuxking idiot just keeps wasting my time.  

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-8-21 18:36 編輯
While the railway network and flaws are in theory independent, in practice, the bewildering pace at  ...
Lik 發表於 2011-8-21 18:24


Can you Fuxking Idiot see the NEED of railway network and the pace of building and as well the problem of corruption are also INDEPENDENT issues?

Will the need of the network change if the pace of building and the problem of corruption change?

If you can not get your fuxking brain straight, then just STFU!

Don't waste my time with your fuxking worthless craps.

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-8-21 20:34 編輯
With the corruption problems right now, for every $10 the Central Government gave to build the railw ...
Lik 發表於 2011-8-21 20:05


Let’s say you are hungry and your mom cooks for you. Because of your mom’s improper food handling and cooking method, the food is contaminated and becomes poisonous. After the meal, you are rushed to hospital because of food poisoning.

Will you say you should not have been hungry since your mom cannot cook properly? Will you not be hungry nor take foods until your mom can cook properly and handle food safely?

Can you see your stupidity now?

Get your fuxking brain straight first before showing your stupidity again.

What a waste of my time when I have to do his parents’ job!!!     

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-8-21 21:12 編輯
Are you fxxking stupid or what?!

When I saw the obvious signs that the food has been contaminated a ...
Lik 發表於 2011-8-21 20:57


Are you fuxking brain death or what?

Yes, you can chuck the food into the garbage bin if your mom cannot cook properly. However, does your need for food to fill your stomach have anything to do with whether your mom can cook properly?

Answer me directly fuxking idiot --  "Does your physical need for food depend on whether your mom can cook properly?"


You fuxking idiot mad dog will never have the gut to answer me.  

YOU ARE JUST FUXKING STUPID!!!

What a waste of my time again.   

TOP

Fuking moron,

If your mom can't even cook the food without turning them into poison (that is, if Ch ...
Lik 發表於 2011-8-21 21:20


You fuxking moron,

Just answer my question directly – “Does your physical need for food depend on whether your mom can cook properly?”

Get your gut out and tell us – YES or NO. Will you fuxking coward dare to say YES or NO?

I will wait for you fuxking coward and see whether you have the gut to answer it.

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-8-22 00:02 編輯
回復  rockypath

Technically I don't disagree both of your argument ....both are true and unideal.. ...
Guy 發表於 2011-8-21 21:24



Is my statement that difficult to understand? Ok, I try to restate it in a different way.

A:        You are hungry and you need food to fill your stomach (China needs a high-speed railway network for its future development).

B:        Your mom cooks for you (China builds the railway on its own).

C:        Your mom hires a servant to cook for you (China hires Japan to build the railway for it).

E:        Your mom cannon cook properly (China cannot build the railway because of its technical problems and corruption).

F:        The servant can cook wonderfully (Japanese technology is very advanced far beyond what is required and Japan has no corruption problem).

The logic is:

#1:        You are hungry. Does it have anything to do with who is cooking?  NO! If you are hungry, then you are hungry. It has nothing to do with who is cooking or no one is cooking for you.

#2:        You are hungry. Does it have anything to do with whether your mom can cook properly?  NO! If you are hungry, then you are hungry. It has nothing to do with whether your mom know how to cook or how wonderfully the servant she hires can cook.  Or you have to cook it for yourself.

OK, do you understand the statement I wanted to make now – China’s need for high-speed railway networks for its future development has nothing to do with its technical flaws or corruption problem?  

Last, mom’s intention has nothing to do with whether his son is hungry or not. If a son is hungry, then he is hungry regardless mom’s intention is good or bad.

Do I have to find another method to make my statement more clear?

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-8-22 10:15 編輯
Moron,

I never said China's need for high speed rail network have anything to do with the technical ...
Lik 發表於 2011-8-22 09:47


So, you finally admit physical need for food (China needs high-speed railway networks) has not thing to do with whether your mom can cook properly (whether China has the capability to build properly)?!

This is just a lesson telling you to use your brain more instead of your ass if you want to challenge me next time.

It was you who 先撩人者賤 (特別是不懷好意) - “一直讚高鐵讚到上天嘅 Peter仔呢?一直支持起高鐵嘅FY同Rocky呢?點解全部死撚散唔知去邊度?” (direct quote from your own words in post #2).

Just quote what I said exactly about China high-speed railway instead of putting words into my mouth.

1)        Did I support the building of high-speed railway network?  YES.
2)        Did I support the pace of building?                NO.
3)        Did I support the size of the network being build?                NO.
4)        Was I concerned about the safety of the network (both technical and operational)?                YES.
5)        Did I recognize the problem of corruption?        YES.

If you are looking for someone to fuxk here, that person can only be yourself.

TOP

返回列表