本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-8-22 00:02 編輯
回復 rockypath
Technically I don't disagree both of your argument ....both are true and unideal.. ...
Guy 發表於 2011-8-21 21:24 
Is my statement that difficult to understand? Ok, I try to restate it in a different way.
A: You are hungry and you need food to fill your stomach (China needs a high-speed railway network for its future development).
B: Your mom cooks for you (China builds the railway on its own).
C: Your mom hires a servant to cook for you (China hires Japan to build the railway for it).
E: Your mom cannon cook properly (China cannot build the railway because of its technical problems and corruption).
F: The servant can cook wonderfully (Japanese technology is very advanced far beyond what is required and Japan has no corruption problem).
The logic is:
#1: You are hungry. Does it have anything to do with who is cooking? NO! If you are hungry, then you are hungry. It has nothing to do with who is cooking or no one is cooking for you.
#2: You are hungry. Does it have anything to do with whether your mom can cook properly? NO! If you are hungry, then you are hungry. It has nothing to do with whether your mom know how to cook or how wonderfully the servant she hires can cook. Or you have to cook it for yourself.
OK, do you understand the statement I wanted to make now – China’s need for high-speed railway networks for its future development has nothing to do with its technical flaws or corruption problem?
Last, mom’s intention has nothing to do with whether his son is hungry or not. If a son is hungry, then he is hungry regardless mom’s intention is good or bad.
Do I have to find another method to make my statement more clear? |