mcjohnjohn

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-11 23:57 發表
Of course, even I say there is only a few Christians have these 8 things in the whole world, there must be "someone" coming up and deny it. And that "someone" is very likely a Christian but not non-believer. Why? Cuz only people in that particular group will defend. Just like your comment, you don't think there will be a Christian saying "no, Christians are not kind and mercy" but only non-believers will. This kind of saying other people are stereotyping all because of certain people don't want to face the truth, not because of whether the issue is stereotyping or not, which it is always an excuse.

I can claim that "not all Christians are kind and mercy", do I need to "defend" that? why?
Does a Christian need to defend other Christians even they are doing bad? For me, I don't think so law.

Seems that certain people don't want to face the truth...

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-11 23:57 發表
How about I say "All cats like to eat fish" and "Most dogs will obey/listen to their owners"? Am I still stereotyping? Only because you people think those 8 things are not really existing at all. Or how about I say "1 out of 10 Christians have these 8 things" or "8 out of 10 Christians have these 8 things"? To you people, I'm still stereotyping, all because of you guys don't want to face the truth to non-believers' eyes.

... well, it seems that 1 out of 10 Ultraman enjoys stereotyping~

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-12 14:00 發表

This is kind of silly and childish argument.
For example, I say: "usually human have two eyes and one nose." And you say I'm stereotyping, cuz there are babies only have one eye and no  nose in born. ...

大家真係仲未發現其實一切既謎一早已經解開左喇咩?
登登登登~ 等我金田莊莊同大家解釋一下啦!
各人所認識既基督徒, 試問點會係同一班呢? 有人遇著一班冇咁好既, 就當然覺得基督徒唔係好野. 有人遇著一班好既, 就會覺得基督徒係好野啦~
睇投票既數據, 就知道LYK既voter遇到差既基督徒既機會係大過遇著好既基督徒!

呢個小弟十分同意, 因為小弟都係一個差既基督徒, 有好多地方要改善呀~ 不過, 包唔包括呢八點就見仁見智啦~

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-12 15:07 發表

Same to you, mjj. You're now stereotyping the possibility of how this result came out.

Ultraman兄, 可否詳細解釋一下小弟o係邊一個層面有stereotype?

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-12 15:19 發表
Why there are troublesome people who like to make things more complicated, and even worse, turn nothing to a problem, and enlarge a small problem to a big one?

我地真係心有靈犀!
我心裡都有呢一個相同既問題, 不過只係唔好意思同大家講law.

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 daimo 於 2009-1-12 15:41 發表


我笑咗.

yeah, 我終於成功create到一個爛gag 了!

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-12 17:20 發表
You said: "睇投票既數據, 就知道LYK既voter遇到差既基督徒既機會係大過遇著好既基督徒!"
To someone's pov, how do you know all "LYK既voter遇到差既基督徒既機會係大過遇著好既基督徒"? One of the other chances is, some LYK might 遇到好既基督徒, but just want to pump up the voting result? And lots more possibilities. So you're stereotyping there is only one possibility.

死啦~ 今次我又唔覺得自己有問題woh.
雖然你講既野好似好有道理, 真係好似好有道理咁.
但有時道理同歪理只係一線之差, LYK既眼睛係雪亮既, 一睇就知一切都係我錯! 係我stereotyping, 請各位怪我一個好了, 因為我係基督徒之中既敗類呢~

小弟只係一廂情願咁覺得d 人投基督徒有xx問題既時候, 應該係自己親身體會過. 真係完全冇諗過有人會為左pump up voting result 而投票的. 更加冇諗過會有人係為左專登中傷基督徒而投票的.

最後, 如果真係有人惡意投票, 小弟唔介意比佢地打埋另一邊面. (嘻嘻, 比知佢地打唔到我先至咁講架乍~)

mcjohnjohn

要解釋既, 一早已經解釋左;
要講既意見, 一早已經講哂.

何必再糾纏落去呢?
小弟就玩夠喇, 呢個post 真好, 唔錯~
多謝咁多位LYK積極既參與呢! 亦都多謝admin給予大家一個自由既平台作出理性既討論啊~

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-15 20:47 發表
蘇牧師已經完全指出同要求同性伴侶唔應該受家庭暴力條例保護. 變相係無人道之言, 換句話基既就唔應該受法律保護. 咁膠既要求都有. 咁如果係唔係人民都有權要求神經人唔可以受法律保護, 因為神經人受擺佈所指既耶人保 ...

你係唔係Lancer兄? 我等得你好苦呀...

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-15 21:24 發表
咩野Cancer

我唔係咩兄, 我就係神

咁你係唔係Lancer神呀?