mcjohnjohn

原帖由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-8 09:31 發表

really?  but I think God should be omnipresence wor...

乜omnipresence 唔係之話在心中咩?...
無處不在, 我覺得就係心裡啦.

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 MoiRhapsody 於 2009-1-8 09:50 發表
等等....
我唔係好記得，
邊個講過，
救贖是為罪人的，
默西亞就是罪人們的默西亞，
耶穌來就是為罪人而來的，
記唔記得邊到講過？？

...... 鬼記得咩...
希望有d對聖誕熟悉d 既人答到你啦.

其實, 天主教徒比基督教徒相對少背聖經內容. 小弟都唔好意識同人講信聖經既野, 因為小弟好多野都唔識背, 一比人大一大就啞口無言.
我信主既心態就等於我肯定自己係阿媽生既, 我唔需要搵證明prove丫, 我話我係阿媽生就係阿媽生. 哈哈~

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-8 10:13 發表

bible

聖經教人食雞? 唔係阿化...

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-8 10:15 發表

this, maybe their ORIGINAL thought at the very first beginning, but then they change to convince other people to believe what they believe.

小弟覺得, 只要懷著一顆友愛既心, 就唔會咁諗架喇.
佢地都係為你好jel, 雖然佢地既concept你唔buy, 不過佢地都唔係想害你既, 所以唔駛hate 佢地woh.

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-8 10:34 發表
kum dou duck ar???
is this what's call "9 ng dap 8"?

點解唔得? 邊個話唔得?
人地都可能會覺得基督徒"kum dou duck ar???", 耶穌死而復活"kum dou duck ar???".
做人放開D 好.

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-8 10:36 發表
no u misunderstood me
I mean when they start "sharing their religion" to me, they might have (and should have) the idea of 為小弟好, but once I say no to them and giving out the reasons for the "no". In many cases, the reason for them to keep debating with me is, trying to convince me to agree with them and getting mad that I think their religion is nonsense in some places

u should know the diff for sharing the religions to others for good and, defending personal values

咁又係麻煩D既. 唔信就唔信架啦, 仲乜要逼人去信woh, 好煩架~
至於defending personal values, o係呢度有乜好defend 丫, 大家都想講下自己既POV之麻, 討論下之麻~

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-8 13:26 發表
You lost your mind? Did you forget what issue we've been talking about? Of course, every different man could have different POV and etc. But haven't we keep talking about certain religion? Is that particular religion has no rules/teaching for believers to follow at all? If so, how come the meaning of those rules/teaching can be so widely various? Then how can believer follow, and which rule(s)/teaching(s) can be followed directly and which one(s) up to every personal standard/judgment?

Ultraman, seems that you are the one who lost your mind...
I don't think that ALL Christians should have same POV in ALL areas, can you get it? We are human being ar...
For me, my religion have two major rules:
1. 愛天主
2. 愛人如己

As I am a human being, I know that I cannot follow some of the rules set by church. (e.g. someone told me that I should not masturbating) I have to admit that I am not a perfect Christian, but who is? Ultraman, Christian is not perfect, and the only perfect one is our God.

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-8 13:29 發表
What do you think the different between to donate money from winning a lottery and money from a robbery? And which (or both) case would be appreciated by God and which wouldn't?

I don't know, please ask God.
I am not a representative of God, and I THINK that he may not want to have both.

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-8 13:33 發表
Please refresh your confusing mind. It is not my thought! I said, why MJ is treated as a gambling-only tool and so Christians can't play it at all even money is not involved. My thought is exactly the other way round. Since money is not involved, so it's shouldn't be a problem for Christians to play MJ.
Now your example is, someone use peeing as a gambling tool, so in those Christians POV, yes they shouldn't pee at all! Which I don't think like this.

SOME of the Christians don't play MJ only, and I am not one of them.
I don't think playing MJ would violate the membership of a Christian, but it is just my opinion. If my God punish me for that, I would accept.

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-8 13:36 發表
Please don't misunderstand me again and again. This was my example to "challenge" or ask Christians, see if they think this is a problem or not. I personally think it isn't! And if I were a Christian, I will definitely help that prostitute. Is that clear?

I just want to tell you that as a Christian, I would definitely help her. Is it clear?
Why do you think Christian would not help that prostitute? Isn't it 鑽牛角尖?