smurf

why wasting all those money and resource while many people (mostly 農民) cannot live well
chunsh 發表於 2012-6-16 21:41

Why could small countries from Europe and Japan bully mighty China in the
late 19th/early 20th century?

Answer: technology !!




Do you think you can keep your Chinese lastname if not for the
fact that Japan surrendered after eating 2 nuke bombs not very
long ago?

If you still don't get it, think about what would happen if Japan was
the first country to successfully develop the nuke bomb?

smurf

Many things need to be done in parallel. If you wait another 20 yrs before space exploration, all  ...
peter236 發表於 2012-6-20 11:09

Dude!
Somebody still maintains the 19th century view of the world........
Just bear with them.

One shortcoming of Chinese:
Using Chinese viewpoints to look at the world and believe it is
the way the world works, which proves numerous times to be
disastrous.

smurf

講得好，講得妙：

有個國家極其富有，有錢人佔全世界十之八九，居然冇全民醫療，有六千萬人冇任何
醫保，同大陸一樣，要「病向錢中醫」，冇錢過主。

但又好其怪，有好多猛人見唔到，時運高？


講番航天：
中國如果冇航天科技，有人會話中國冇用，正係識搞意識型態，假大空。
到現在有點成績，又有人話係面子工程，真係神又係佢，鬼又係佢。


更加有抽水怪講到國防，外交：

如果中國冇「兩彈一星」，外有十多年來針對海、空軍建設同軍事科技有飛躍増長（但比帝國落後多年，所
以PLA 無自滿，仍繼續努力！），你估呀賓仔同死架仔會唔會淨係圍個島呢？上咗去住十幾世喇，連
孫仔都bit咗十九幾件出泥啦！.


又有人話「先安內而後攘外」：
真好笑，你估大陸話咁就咁咩，人地唔會比時間你，同你有親？
咁把豹同帝國反影喇，人地釆你都有味，話圍你就圍你，等你冇啖安落茶飯食！
正所謂，弱國無外交，講到尾外交講唔掂數味又係用軍事對抗。

除非你肯做帝契細佬。
當然世上有好多人鐘意做人契弟，佢地有自曲咁做，不過佢地不代表我，更好彩不代表中國。