fibbi

As I said, both sides did something wrong. But government can use better way to "clear". Not the tank and real bullet.

fibbi

44# soli


May I ask why you think that way?

If both side has no weapon, Army still have advantage since they are trained for combat. Students (like you and me) can win over army?

fibbi

41# soli

OK, there is video that student retreat peacefully, there is also news that students are shot and "look" to death. So if you choose to believe the Govt, feel free. You can think of thousands reason to justify gov't action. I just feel pity for those of you.

fibbi

不過如果有幾十萬軍﹐係我就會封鎖天安門四週﹐斷水斷電斷物資進入﹐人就俾出唔俾入 ...
soli 發表於 2009-4-16 14:52

That's what I mean. There are many better ways to "clear" than shooting and killing.
This gov't choose the worst way.

fibbi

不過如果有幾十萬軍﹐係我就會封鎖天安門四週﹐斷水斷電斷物資進入﹐人就俾出唔俾入 ...
soli 發表於 2009-4-16 14:52

That's what I mean. There are many better ways to "clear" than shooting and killing.
This gov't choose the worst way.

fibbi

就係因為學生有武器﹐丟石﹐丟煙燒彈﹐到處放火。
泰國剛剛3萬人士威到o甘勁﹐當時係有幾十萬人響天安門同附近﹐你自己諗下啦。
soli 發表於 2009-4-16 14:52

If you call stone and 煙燒彈 weapon, army can use 摧淚彈, 防護盾，塑膠子彈, don't have to use real bullet and show off the tank.

fibbi

"六四事件已被支聯會同西方傳媒妖魔化"...This is really "funny"...
I believe what I see in TVB, ATV news. Not from CNN.
If the younger generation 認同 武力鎮壓, I can only say that the govt is really doing a good job, good at brainwashing

fibbi

我心痛嘅原因係有人竟然質疑六四的真確性，好似講到政府武力清場係對嘅，因為學生都係暴民。無人再覺得事件原本只係有學生爭取，要求民主而引起。
估唔到只係二十年，新一代就開始質疑六四，仲犀利個啲日本人話無南京大屠殺，無慰安婦。

fibbi

79# bbqfish

I remembered last year (or the night before) there is candle light event outside chinese embassy house on Granville St, organized by Vancouver 支聯會

fibbi

90# soli


支聯會brainwash? I don't think so. In 89 June, there is NO 支聯會 yet. We saw on ATV, TVB news and newspaper. And not just one newspaper. So you mean every newspaper make up stories? I don't think so.

As I said...both sides are not totally right. But definitely as government, there are better ways to handle.