fibbi

57# rainbow-davie

"we are talking about sex b4 love (or sex with or without love) .. not about relationship.. there are difference."

That's my point. Sex is part of the relationship. To me they can't be "seperated".

fibbi

58# rainbow-davie


我會教個仔唔好隨便. Better to have stable relationship first before considering have SAFE sex.
And I don't see what's wrong with having sex after marriage either.

fibbi

66# B仔


Lust over Love 實會出現is ok, provided that love (and understanding) comes BEFORE lust.    That's my point lor...

fibbi

69# B仔

As long as the person is clean and neat. Avg looking is ok la. Too handsome is "dangerous"

fibbi

70# rainbow-davie


I really hope that it won't happen to you:
One day gf said to you "oh i just went ONS last night because you didn't satisfy me..."
Will you be hurt?
I"m not trying to "curse" you, I just want you to reconsider if lust is so high up in priority, it's not good for the relationship.

fibbi

71# chunsh

Yeah i understand I can't MAKE my children do whatever way. But at least I'll pass on my believe to them.

fibbi

對唔住!因為我既道德觀點不同~ 對於這類型這種思維既男人﹐我斗膽一句﹕ “賤格﹗”*拍拍 (左右一把掌)*  
小叻 發表於 2009-4-30 16:53

yeah!! give me 5!

fibbi

咁都nothing wrong？Then what is "wrong" on your mind?
no matter賤格 or 犯賤，最後受傷嘅都係自己

fibbi

112# BiscottiGelato
"但係o係各人有各人既觀點既時候, 點解要強加自己果一套o係人地身上呢? 意見不同就話人地果套係錯, 又話人地 abnormal, etc etc... 似點火多過討論?"

但係有時候我真係覺得某啲做法係唔啱(i.e.錯)喎，點解唔可以講？