Alcoholic

清高一族
1. as long as you agreed to take those photos, you risk YOUR OWN privacy being leaked. unless you are "天真及傻"  enough to believe that this world has no accidents at all, as long as you took the precaution of saving it onto a harddrive; and that ALL people on earth are "天真及傻" because they will not think of stealing your private stuff...there's no crime in society.
2. you are a public figure.
therefore:
3. that's why people are spreading it and mocking at your stupidity, laughing at your pathetic role model for young generation in society; not necessarily because they saw you naked.

i'm more afraid that the new generation will learn from these stars, and start taking batches of sex photos of themselves, thinking it's fun because they feel like a star...
rather than worrying that people will start running after stars to try and take naked pics of them and think that it's normal.

Alcoholic

原帖由 blueprint 於 2008-2-12 10:28 AM 發表
If people believe the image of the stars through the cameras, then isn't it naive and silly as well?  Their images are most likely to be controlled by their agencies, so what to fuss about?  

What is ...

yep. those are silly people. there are enough silly people in society to support these fake controlled stars. how else do you think they can make millions each year, for years?

point you guys missed is: sexual pictures are NOT unethical. it's only unethical to deny your own actions as a public figure, or just even as a regular civillian. moral is: if you did it, then just suck it up to your OWN responsibility. and of course, it is stupid/suicidal to your own CAREER to accuse all those "silly people" that gave/supported your million dollar income each year, and tell those "silly people" that: you are stupid, the pictures are photoshopped.

if collecting sparkle cards is considered "rape", then that's not fair la... cus we never got a taste of Gil's abalone, nor EDC's miniture chinese sausage wor (of course, we don't want to taste Gil's DRY abalone served with KY sauce, or EDC's mini sausage la....  )
ok, that was a joke.
but the fact is, all you worry about is people having "fun" seeing celebs naked. have you looked at it in another perspective... the power of media, communication medium, that facilitates the reaction of the audience? finally, there are hard evidence that stars are shady & dirty... now no one can say it's only a "rumor".

[ 本帖最後由 Alcoholic 於 2008-2-12 11:08 編輯 ]

Alcoholic

one more point i must mention:

why do people collect sparkle cards?
- to gather more evidence to prove the first statement (移花接木) made by 英皇 WRONG.

even if kira should be held responsible for prying into someone else's privacy, why does society complain that the police is pathetic in action?
- because they work extra hard for the entertainment industy's wealthy AND powerful influence to HK's film industry's income.

why do we mock the female stars, and still step on the first "brave & naive" one to response to the public?
- because she is still not sucking up to her responsibility & actions. she is still in greed for more money from "silly people" trying to "save" her career. she cannot forgo the puppet strings that 英皇 put on her and admit to her damage impact on the young generation & all "silly people" that supports her. 虛偽 & 虛榮

Alcoholic

不問世事,但願製造幸福&單純快樂給這世界,才是高上道德
世上真係冇乜清高既人做得到
問誰真係有資格談論道德呢...

其餘既道德, 都係年代同社會&個人既角度

Alcoholic

改名除了有dam笑之外，都係算被面D"所謂"收害者姐~
既然d人要縮頭認傻認天真都唔肯認真，份份報紙都只敢講"疑是某某"， 咁。。。就算係明知都好，邊個夠薑話"一定係某某"丫? 冇人低能到自己話比D有勢力既人聽"你黎捉我啦"。

唔講道德la...
不如講下一句叫做：有幾耐風光, 就有幾耐折墮
好聽D既解釋 - 因果

再講多一樣野...惡性循環:
當然，做得公眾人物，比人討論係正常
做得人，比別人討論都冇問題，因為觀念/價值不同，不需要爭論，因為大家既立場已好明顯不同。
歡迎你們的批評~
但係當你批評我地黎D咁unethical既人時。。。起不是同我地批評D明星一樣?
所以，世界就是這樣轉，這樣圓。