返回列表 發帖
我比較贊成用退稅方式回饋$6000,另向綜援人仕派發。比較公平。
fibbi 發表於 2011-3-3 15:19


用退稅方式

This would not work, as most Hong Kong people do not need to pay taxes. Those who need to pay, only pay very little.

TOP

回復 11# peter236


    You have any stats to support your claim? What is "very little tax"? HK has lower tax rate, doens't mean people pay no tax.

TOP

回復 10# fy789


    No worries, I don't plan to go to HK for that $6000.

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-3-3 16:13 編輯
回復  peter236


    You have any stats to support your claim? What is "very little tax"? HK has lo ...
fibbi 發表於 2011-3-3 16:09

The stats can be obtained from Hong Kong government. It is a known fact. There is no need to argue here. Most of the people who pay tax only need to pay little.

TOP

回復 14# peter236


So what? Even people who work and pay little tax, they contribute to the govt income and makes sense to get refund.

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-3-3 16:17 編輯
回復  peter236


So what? Even people who work and pay little tax, they contribute to the govt inc ...
fibbi 發表於 2011-3-3 16:14


You are actually agreeing with me. 用退稅方式 does not work since most people do not pay taxes. So there is no taxes to be refunded.
Just give everyone straight cash.

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

回復  fibbi


    我冇新數碼香港身份證,所以無得攞!
fy789 發表於 2011-3-3 16:17

Just get a new number.

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-3-3 16:24 編輯

Just copy and paste from another website:

Hong Kong tax rates are so low.

The salaries tax rate is the lower of either:

    * 15% of "assessable income" after the deduction of allowances; or


    * A progressive rate levied on "assessable income" after the deduction of allowances. For the 2009/10 tax year onwards, these progressive rates are:
      
          o Nil to HKD40,000 - 2%
          o HKD40,000 to HKD80,000 – 7%
          o HKD80,000 to HKD120,000 – 12%
          o HKD120,000 upwards – 17%


Allowances and Deductions

For the 2009/10 year of assessment, the following allowances are deductible from assessable income for salaries tax purposes:

    * Charitable contributions representing up to 35% of an individual's income after allowable expenses and depreciation allowances or assessable profits.
    * A residential care allowance in respect of a parent or grandparent of up to HKD60,000 per annum.
    * Home loan interest deductions from 2003/4 of up to HKD100,000 in any one year of assessment.
    * A current pension allowance of up to HKD12,000 for each year of assessment, not including contributions made by a self-employed person in respect of his employees.
    * Depreciation allowances on all plant and machinery essential to the production of income subject to salaries tax.
    * A single person's allowance of HKD108,000 (2009/10).
    * A married persons' allowance of HKD2165,000 (2009/10).
    * Child allowances of HKD50,000 for each dependant on the 1st to the 9th child (2009/10).
    * Dependent parent, grandparent,sister, brother sibling (to include more than one where necessary) - allowances HKD30,000 each (2009/10).
    * Dependent disabled person's allowance of HKD60,000 (2009/10).
    * Education allowance of HKD60,000 for any course which educates or assists an employee in his profession.




Just do the calculations, most people do not pay or just pay little taxes.

TOP

回復 16# peter236


    No I don't agree with you. I said I prefer tax refund because those people contribute to the government income. I don't agree paying everyone straight cash.

Of course, to low income family/individual or people on welfare should get the subsidy as well as I said in previous post.

TOP

返回列表