支聯會示威遭人包圍責罵 陳巧文被警員帶走 香港警方, 北京, 火炬, 酒店, 衣服

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-5-2 14:41 發表
陳小姐當街俾人鬧，話晒都係受害者，點解仲要俾警察 "帶走"？而且其實佢上次都已經俾警察 "帶走" 過去問話，依家又來多次？

如果有一個車路士球迷, o係曼聯既奧脫福主場拎住支藍戰士獅子旗滿場揮動, 奧脫福主場球迷一定會媽到佢飛起, 在場既防暴警察為左平息騷亂, 一定會帶走一個車路士球迷而唔會帶走幾千個曼聯球迷.

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-5-2 14:41 發表
支聯會成員俾人打，警察就淨係叫襲擊者離開。如果換左係長毛出手打人，你話警察會唔會咁順灘？（當然，長毛同支聯會D成員攪左社會運動咁耐，又點會做D咁蠢既事呢？）

如果有三十個人圍住一班支聯會既人, 都好難identify 到邊個人出手. 唔通唔知邊個出手就拉哂佢地番去? 而家遊行示範係會錄低既, 有証有據既話, 支聯會之後都可以報警話比人打.
警察既主要任務係維持場面既秩序, 呢個時候執法既話, 反而會令場面更加混亂.

力兄...好一個深明大義既民主戰士!

chunsh

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-5-2 01:14 發表
係踩場又如何？英國球迷係 hooligans，係 goons，係 thugs 就係人都知，而佢地既臭名亦傳遍全歐洲。但香港街頭又豈同英國球場？

暫時來講，陳小姐未自己回應佢響咩情況下被警察帶走，但如果警察真係為左保護佢既話，新聞稿既字面上 ...

in order to protect both sides' 市民既安全同財產, what would u do if u are the cops?
seperating the crowds by trying to control the crowd with larger number?
or control the groups by bringing away the small crowd from the place?

soli

點解無用電槍?

SAZABI

原帖由 Traum 於 2008-5-2 08:01 發表
Please read through my previous post, Chunsh. 陳巧文被多名警員制服，隨後被警員抬走。 Is this how the police protect citizens? Is this how the police protect the victims? If I smack you in your face, wou ...

None of us were there, so we don't know why the police need to 制服.
But don't you think it is reasonable to think that the girl exert some kind of resistance when she was asked to leave?  I won't believe the cops just use force to 制服 her as soon as they see her presence lor.

Mr.JPG

如果換左係個樣貌普通既男學生
有甘大回響嗎