「港公務員成敗也英國」 王光亞指執行強規劃弱 北京, 香港, 北京, 香港

lo_pak

【明報專訊】香港公務員團隊過去鮮被中央批評，國務院港澳辦主任王光亞昨日卻直指香港公務員執行強、規劃弱。王光亞接受香港大學生提問時稱，香港「成也英國，敗也英國」，認為香港公務員在港英培訓下，水平很好，但只懂接受及執行命令，即使在回歸後當家作主，也「不知道怎樣當Boss（老闆）、怎樣當個Master（主人）」，力促公務員為香港未來作更多長遠規劃，「不要只把今天的事做好」。


王光亞昨日於北京與60名赴京參與「大學生外交夏令營」的香港學生對話，對他們提出針對本港貧富懸殊、經濟發展，以及特首選舉的提問均有問必答。被問及本港當前面對的深層矛盾為何時，王光亞主動提及本港師承英國的公務員制度。

稱「只懂執行 不知怎樣當Boss」

王光亞直言香港「成也英國，敗也英國」，指在港英治下，英國人主導香港事務，培養出的香港公務員水平雖高，但只懂接受及執行指令，「完全培養的是civil servant （公僕），而未能培養對香港未來發展，加以政治上設計和長遠規劃的人才」。

他批評，縱然香港已回歸10多年，大部分公務員的心態卻是「叫我做什麼就做什麼……他們過去是聽Boss（老闆），現在自己當了Boss，都不知道怎樣當Boss，怎樣當個Master（主人）」。

他認為，特區政府應按香港的情况作長遠設計及規劃，各級官員更應「不僅把今天的事做好，而是要把香港明天、後天，2年、3年、5年、10年以後的事要想好，設定好目標，自己設定政策，包括人才的培養，面向目標向前走」。

籲「想好10年以後 不僅做好今天」

前保安局長、現立法會議員葉劉淑儀同意王光亞的言論，認為他「想得很通透」。她稱，香港公務員以效率及辦事能力高聞名，但欠缺當領導的視野及膽識，「當年（港督）一聲話要收難民，我們便『拿拿臨』租船、辦難民營……老闆叫到，就落力去做囉，但其實公務員沒有開新格局的勇氣，制度只是訓練公務員服從」。葉太相信王光亞不是基於兩三件事件就貿然批評公務員，而是總結香港回歸後14年的經驗「有感而發」。

「問責制致欠方向」 學者指斷錯症

不過，中大政治與行政學系高級導師蔡子強認為，本港發展問責制，將制訂長遠政策的責任交予司局級官員，才是導致公務員缺乏方向的主因，他批評王光亞的言論「斷錯症，落錯藥」，對公務員有欠公道。

lo_pak

【明報專訊】香港公務員團隊過去鮮被中央批評，國務院港澳辦主任王光亞昨日卻直指香港公務員執行強、規劃弱 ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-7-26 21:44

Is he talking about HK should fight for independence??

Needless him to say, most of HKers know that for long already... Can't he see where the reason is? He will get trapped after he'd digged more through to it... One nation, two systems, one nation cannot override two systems... It's not one system...

Or, the topic should be... success,  for one nation; failure, for one nation, too...

I think Taiwanese are way luckier than our HKers...

mcjohnjohn

不過，中大政治與行政學系高級導師蔡子強認為，本港發展問責制，將制訂長遠政策的責任交予司局級官員，才是導致公務員缺乏方向的主因，他批評王光亞的言論「斷錯症，落錯藥」，對公務員有欠公道。

我好想知道唔行問責制既話, d 公務員既辦事方法會同而家唔一樣嗎? 哈哈!!!
真係好諷刺... 阿爺好似講中哂, 香港人真的不知道怎樣當Boss（老闆）、怎樣當個Master（主人）. 或者係有能力既人已經去哂商界發展了.

ricrick

貓哭老鼠？

mcjohnjohn

貓哭老鼠？
ricrick 發表於 2011-7-27 15:44

我覺得如果英國人講既就係貓哭老鼠.

ricrick

英國佬都吾九理你

mcjohnjohn

英國佬都吾九理你
ricrick 發表於 2011-7-27 16:10

當然唔理啦! 唔通o係度貓哭老鼠咩...

Ovaltine

What about constitutional changes? I don't see why the PRC don't change HK into an experiment, such as universal suffrage. Wasn't communism in China a failed experiment by the Russians in the first place? They told us One country, two systems. Like Dayo Wong said, they are just admitting their system scares people. If the PRC have guts, then let those punks protestors be in charge for a couple years, see what happens. Of course, those in power are in constant fear of losing power.

I actually come in contact with a lot of Chinese people at work. Most are expert con man, their business skills lies upon conning people, and this reflect the governing body of PRC also. Propaganda and conning citizens into believe this is the best they got.

Lik

To a certain extent, 王光亞 is spot on with his remarks. In the current administration, those in power are really incapable of being leaders. Under the British HK rule, the British were really most just training the civil servants to be excellent workers in operations / execution, but not as leaders and visionaries. Those positions were held by the HK Governor or other staff appointed by the UK.

But that is not to say that the HK system could not and did not produce people with leadership qualities. Szeto Wah, Martin Lee, Yuk Man, Audrey Eu, and maybe even Anson Chan, and these are only people involved in politics. In the business world, there are no shortage of people that could have / would have become good leaders in the political realm had both the British HK government and Grandfather fostered a healthier political environment.

Ovaltine, CCP would never allow any place under their control to become experiments of democracy because they know democracy will spread like wild fire, resulting in them losing their governing power. Even with as much unrest as there in in Mainland China now, they are still clinging on to every last measure they can use to influence, control, and suppress their citizens into continuing with their roles as mere peasants.

-Lik