satil

"參與遊行，也要知會警方!!!!"

乜世界 !!

rockypath

回復 8# Lik

你不需要對我說對不起。我更願意聽到你向大家道歉 － “對不起大家，阿力我細路仔唔知世紀。大家大人不計小人過。”

You want to have my answer? Sure, I always have the gut to face you directly unlike you always run away like a losing dog and avoid facing me.

I do not agree with what she said and she is politically stupid to say – “參與遊行需知會警方”.

Regardless what kind of freedom you ask for, the reality is – there is no “unlimited” freedom without restriction.

Lik

回復  Lik

I do not agree with what she said and she is politically stupid to say – “參與遊行需知會警方”.

Regardless what kind of freedom you ask for, the reality is – there is no “unlimited” freedom without restriction.
rockypath 發表於 2011-8-20 00:39

你認咗係自己發雞盲就得喇～

而且，基本法裡面明文寫住話香港人有集會、申訴、言論自由等基本權利。落街着咩衫又算唔算係 unlimited freedom呀？示威區嘅國際慣例係要示威對象可以用肉眼睇得見嘅範圍之內，但依家香港人仲有無集會、申訴、同表達意見嘅自由呀？你今次特衰政府同特區公安局如果唔係成壇野搞得咁樣衰，又會唔會俾人全方位圍插呀？

答我啦，無恥之徒！

-力

rockypath

示威區嘅國際慣例係要示威對象可以用肉眼睇得見嘅範圍之內，但依家香港人仲有無集會、申訴、同表達意見嘅自由呀？你今次特衰政府同特區公安局如果唔係成壇野搞得咁樣衰，又會唔會俾人全方位圍插呀？

答我啦，無恥之徒！

Lik 發表於 2011-8-20 09:45

跟你這個愚蠢無比又不學無術的蠢人溝通真是浪費精力又浪費時間。

所謂的學者告訴你說照慣例示威區是設在目視可以看到的地方。那你是否知道過更多的慣例是設在１～２公里以外的地方。你是可以看得到，但是要有望遠鏡並且沒有大廈擋住你的視線。

美國在中國領導人訪問期間特意將示威區設在中國領導人看得到和聽得到的距離。 司馬昭之心，路人皆知。但你這只狗肯定是要維護你的主人。

為什麼美國總統在視察各個州的時候，示威區被設置在他根本看不到，聽不到，記者也懶得去採訪的１～２公里之外？ 不肯聽從ＯＲＤＥＲ在示威區示威的示威者不單只是被驅趕，還被ＡＲＲＥＳＴ和落ＣＨＡＲＧＥ！ 那你這條狗有咬你的主人嗎？

真是人蠢無藥醫。浪費我時間。  

Lik

你無野呀化？報紙、新聞成日都有報導美國總統、州長等等點樣被示威者響集會當中追擊、抗議等等都係等閒事。而Schwarzenegger更加試過被掟雞蛋、加拿大前總理 Chretien被掟pie。做得領導人就預咗有反對聲音。唔識得處之太然嘅你就咪撚做領導人啦～

而且你都仲未答我：今次特衰政府同特區公安局如果唔係成壇野搞得咁樣衰，又會唔會俾人全方位圍插呀？依家又使唔使出來解咁多話呀？

人賤無藥醫。返去舔阿爺屎眼啦，契弟！

-力

rockypath

你無野呀化？報紙、新聞成日都有報導美國總統、州長等等點樣被示威者響集會當中追擊、抗議等等都係等閒事。 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-8-21 00:08

Don't waste my time idiot mad dong Lik.

Just prove what I said about the "protest zoon" is not true. Don't waste my time with you stupid BS.

Second, I don't think what HK police did is unreasonably unacceptable. In fact, I don't think it is that serious. Compare to US Security Service. HK police is absolutely 小巫見大巫，拍馬都追不上。 Again, just prove US Security Service has a softer hand than HK police instead of wasting my time again.

I will wait for your proof. But don't waste my time with you worthless craps again.

Lik

Second, I don't think what HK police did is unreasonably unacceptable. In fact, I don't think it is that serious. Compare to US Security Service. HK police is absolutely 小巫見大巫，拍馬都追不上。 Again, just prove US Security Service has a softer hand than HK police instead of wasting my time again.
rockypath 發表於 2011-8-21 01:17

所以你係賤人一名。

特區公安響無警告、無表面身份嘅情況之下就拉咗着6.4tee果位阿哥，咁做根本就係犯法嘅所為。而對港大嘅同學就更加做出非法禁錮。你公安係夠料嘅話就拘捕呢兩條友啦？再唔係告埋佢地添啦？US Security Service又好，老美警察又好，零星嘅違規事件絕對會發生，但好似香港今次咁樣有組織、有部署、有計劃嘅犯法行為你又幾時見過呀，賤種？！

而且，你都仲係未答我呀，死剷！今次特衰政府同特區公安局如果唔係成壇野搞得咁樣衰，又會唔會俾人全方位圍插呀？依家又使唔使出來解咁多話呀？答啦，仆街！

-力

rockypath

而且，你都仲係未答我呀，死剷！今次特衰政府同特區公安局如果唔係成壇野搞得咁樣衰，又會唔會俾人全方位圍插呀？依家又使唔使出來解咁多話呀？答啦，仆街！
Lik 發表於 2011-8-21 10:57

Did you not understand my human talk? I had said I had not much complain about HK government and police force. They got their jobs to do. There are certainly areas they can work on to improve as always in any event. You can never please everyone.

俾人全方位圍插? Just look at who are 插ing HK government and police.