返回列表 發帖

B.C. judge rules in favour of offspring of anonymous sperm donors

B.C. judge rules in favour of offspring of anonymous sperm donors



VANCOUVER -- A B.C.-born woman has won a landmark court battle to give children of gamete donors the same rights as adopted children to learn about their biological parents, after a judge struck down B.C.'s Adoption Act as being unconstitutional.

Olivia Pratten filed the lawsuit — the first of its kind in North America — to try to get the same rights for offspring born as a result of anonymous sperm, egg and embryo donors as adopted children have to learn about their complete genetic makeup when they come of age.

B.C. Supreme Court Justice Elaine Adair ruled Thursday in a 123-page decision that B.C. Adoption Act regulations were unconstitutional.

But the judge suspended the effect of the ruling for 15 months to allow the B.C. government to draft new legislation that does not violate Section 15 of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The judge also granted a permanent injunction to prohibit the destruction and disposal of the records of gamete donors, which includes anonymous donors of sperm, eggs and embryos. One of the important consequences of the ruling is that anonymous gamete donation will no longer be permitted in B.C.

The court's ruling will not be retroactive, meaning those who made anonymous sperm donations in the past will not have their records revealed to their offspring without consent of the donor.

"It's great news. I'm really happy," Pratten, a 29-year-old Toronto journalist, said Thursday. "I'm really pleased. It's the first ruling of its kind in North America."

The ruling is a validation, she said, of what she has felt for years, although it won't help her trace her biological father..

Pratten sought to change the system so that donors and offspring can contact each other if there is mutual consent when the offspring become adults. "It was never about me," she said. "It's about the future."

Pratten's lawyer, Joe Arvay, said: "This case represents a monumental victory for our client, Olivia Pratten, and all the donor offspring she represents who have for too long been disadvantaged by their exclusion from the legislative landscape which has promoted and perpetuated prejudice and stereotyping and caused them grave harm. "

Arvay argued at trial last year that children born from gamete donations should have the same rights as adopted children to learn information, when they turn 19, about their biological parents.

There now is a trend to make it optional for sperm donors to allow contact by offspring: Sweden, Holland, the United Kingdom and parts of Australia have eliminated anonymous gamete donations.

Pratten maintained it's important to know her medical and social history in order to properly form her sense of identity.

She asked the court to impose a permanent injunction prohibiting the destruction of medical records of anonymous donors.

Although she had a mother and father while growing up, Pratten felt she was missing an important part of her background because she has been unable to learn anything more than the basic physical details about her biological father.

Her parents could not have children so they turned to a Vancouver clinic operated by Dr. Gerald Korn.

Korn, who retired in 2002 and is in his 80s, artificially inseminated Pratten's mother using donated sperm. Korn said he had the records in 2002 that Pratten sought, but later said they were destroyed.

Leah Greathead, the lawyer representing B.C.'s attorney-general, argued the privacy rights of anonymous sperm donors should outweigh the constitutional rights of donor offspring.

She pointed out that the federal government has already enacted legislation, the Assisted Human Reproduction Act, to regulate gamete donors and to create a national sperm bank.

The lawyer said that act, at the time the Pratten case was argued in court last September, wasn't fully in effect after a Quebec legal challenge, which was heard in April 2009 by the Supreme Court of Canada, and the decision was still pending.

She suggested Pratten's legal action was premature because of the pending ruling to determine whether the issue falls under federal or provincial jurisdiction.

(On Dec. 22, 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada rendered a divided 4-4-1 decision, striking down portions of the act.)

Greathead argued that if the B.C. Supreme Court judge did strike down B.C.'s Adoption Act, the effect should be suspended for more than a year to allow the government time to draft new legislation. Arvay suggested the suspension period should be six months.

Pratten's mother, Shirley Pratten, said earlier that the provincial and federal governments have failed to preserve the medical records of children born through gamete donors, creating a lost generation of kids.

She has made submissions to House of Commons and Senate committees since 1985, trying to win for her daughter the same rights as offspring who are adopted.

A study from the Commission on Parenthood's Future found children conceived by sperm donation are more likely to suffer from isolation and depression, and are roughly twice as likely as biological children to struggle with substance abuse.

Such children have a unique and often isolating relationship to themselves that others may not fully understand, the study found.

TOP


In this file photo, Canadian journalist Olivia Pratten poses for a portrait in a park in midtown Manhattan.


Olivia Pratten is seeking to find out the identity of her biological father. “This is not about replacing a parent,” she says

TOP

simple.. just no one will donate sperm anymore. simple.

TOP

返回列表