Where is the logic.................... logic, Where

puZZle

法令無法遏止 印度最高法院建議賣淫合法化
(法新社)2009年12月10日 星期四 21:35

（法新社新德里10日電） 印度    媒體今天報導，儘管法令限制一籮筐，印度性交易仍蓬勃發展，最高法院因此建議讓賣淫合法化，以解決猖獗的性交易問題。

「印度聯合新聞通訊社」（Press Trust of India）引述最高法院告訴副檢察總長的話：「如果這是世上最古老的行業，當法律無力矯正時，何不讓它合法化？」報導中未說明是那位大法官做此建議。

賣淫在印度是違法行為，但警方往往視而不見。

據「國家愛滋病    管制組織」（National AIDSControl Organisation），全印約有120萬名性工作者，其中許多人多年來一直敦促讓賣淫全面合法化。

性工作者去年獲人壽保險投保權利，他 o們也為納入印度勞工法保護而奮鬥。

今年7月，德里高等法院（Delhi High Court）為男同志性交除罪。人權運動者認為，此舉不但有助於遏止愛滋病在印度擴散，更可鼓勵愛滋感染者勇於尋求治療，並吸收相關資訊。

印度政府估計，全印愛滋感染者達200萬至310萬人。（譯者：中央社何宏儒）

Ultraman

I don't need to know what the actual figure is.  I just want to point out to you that going one way or the other will not be the same for money spent like you said.  That was my point.
shutterbug 發表於 2009-12-12 00:59

Come on! Who said "exactly the same"?! However, no matter in terms of manpower and/or money and/or other factors, they could count as "comparable" to each other. Which, we have no idea and no solid figure for how much exactly they are going to spend on each case, but certain manpower and money (and other possible factors) would be spent anyways. Unlike someone said/thought, sounded like no manpower nor money will be needed to spend on a specific case. And that was my point.

shutterbug

No matter it's legal or illegal, do you really think they'll disclose the actual expense to the public?
Try not to think too much and relate too much. We don't even count corruption in any cases, who knows the actual figure is?!

I don't need to know what the actual figure is.  I just want to point out to you that going one way or the other will not be the same for money spent like you said.  That was my point.

Ultraman

Not really.  If it's illegal the police is working in a black box and you don't know how much police force is allocated for prostitution. They can do more or less depending on budget.
shutterbug 發表於 2009-12-11 16:35

No matter it's legal or illegal, do you really think they'll disclose the actual expense to the public?
Try not to think too much and relate too much. We don't even count corruption in any cases, who knows the actual figure is?!

shutterbug

For the money issue, no matter in which way would be pretty much the same.
Either, to spend money to arrange special or more cop teams to investigate and stop illegal prostitution; or, to spend mone ...
Ultraman 發表於 2009-12-11 14:26

Not really.  If it's illegal the police is working in a black box and you don't know how much police force is allocated for prostitution. They can do more or less depending on budget.

habitrailspace

just curious, what level?
chunsh 發表於 2009-12-11 16:31

like some lyk disagree with the snow tires. they never tried it (they are not up to that LEVEL)

chunsh

i dun support this post
something here u will never understand bcoz ur not up to that LEVEL
habitrailspace 發表於 2009-12-11 15:19

just curious, what level?

Ultraman

["如果酒唔係會令人high同醉，根本唔會有人會俾咁既價錢黎飲。"  
$50 for a bottle of red wine. I drink a glass at a time, don't get high, don't get drunk wor...]
Yes, many people drink alcohol not intend to get drunk, but to enjoy the taste of it.

[ "而且亦都會有人係enjoy大麻味。"
Hm...算我無知/孤陋寡聞我真係無諗過有人會鐘意大麻浸味。。。]
Well, I'm not a 大麻 guy. But I somehow believe, those who take 大麻 might enjoy the smell of it too. Which it makes sense, or if they hate or can't bear the smell, they won't take it.

[我真係覺得嫖妓係不道德行為 (交易) 嘅一種]
Agree.

[我係覺得不道德嘅行為有法律去監管無乜問題]
Agree.

habitrailspace

76# MoiRhapsody


做錯事(e.g. fail exam, dump a pregnant gf in your example)唔一定犯法，但係犯法嘅就一定係錯事，啱嘛？

"如果酒唔係會令人high同醉，根本唔會有人會俾咁既價錢黎飲。"  
$50 for a bottle  ...
fibbi 發表於 2009-12-11 15:10

i dun support this post
something here u will never understand bcoz ur not up to that LEVEL

Littleprince

Oh of course you can be one of them. But as long as you tell me you're talking about nonsense/garbage, I can ignore you.
Ultraman 發表於 2009-12-11 14:28

you don't have to mention to me as I can tell myself and will just ignore you, you can see that