Is Campbell shuffle enough to stop Liberal slide?
Cabinet to be changed up
Mike Lloyd Oct 25, 2010 07:04:47 AM
2 Comment(s) 2 Recommendation(s) Related Stories
•Cabinet shuffle expected Monday
•B.C. Premier dispels resignation rumours
•Campbell: HST is a done deal
VICTORIA (NEWS1130) - Are juggling the lines a winning strategy for Team Campbell? News1130 chatted with voters on the streets of Vancouver ahead of today's cabinet shuffle in Victoria.
The decision made by Premier Gordon Campbell to change things up comes a couple of days ahead of his televised address to British Columbians. His approval ratings have also hit rock bottom, he's sitting at a dismal nine per cent.
So we asked you, 'Is there anything he can do to reverse that?' And many people agreed the Liberals made their bed with the Harmonized Sales Tax, now they can lie in it.
One man says they just did what they wanted to do. "They've got their own agenda and they stick to it. They'll do their lies, they'll campaign, they'll say their things and it's a bunch of crap."
Rumours are swirling about some of the cabinet moves. Some say current Minister of Children and Family Development Mary Polak may take on the role of Education Minister.
Meanwhile Minister of Environment Barry Penner will take the Solicitor-General position and the consensus seems to be that Colin Hansen will stick as Finance Minister, to keep a strong front in the HST fight.
One way to find out who they have connections with is to look at where their funding comes from. These are usually confidential info and it's hard to get sometimes but here is something interesting.
I am saying this from my experience in the Business faculty of a local Canadian university, where ...
fm9610 發表於 2010-10-27 13:19
Tell me how is this related? You mean you spend a lot of time studying this Fraser Institude and dug up all the relevant events and people and studied them all? BTW, what did you write your thesis on?
While they are not explicitly paid to do their so-called "research" work, you have to look at where ...
Lik 發表於 2010-10-27 11:32
You moron jai~~
What you are saying is that in a two party situation, there is little difference between the parties. That means you have a one-party dictatorship here.
That is why you need to bave a chaotic 6 - 12 parties to achieve some form of democracy.
發表於 2010-10-25 07:27
| 
