返回列表 發帖

Layton and the NDP's Surge

With the federal election only a few days away, all signs are pointing to yet another minority Conservative government, with Jack Layton and the NDP as the official opposition party. Obviously, Ignatieff is the biggest loser here, and I would personally expect nothing less than an immediate resignation as the Liberal leader after the election is done.

I am not really surprised by Ignatieff's demise, but what really surprises me though is Layton and the NDP's surge in the polls. Are people really supportive of him and the NDP, as polls suggest that Canadians think Layton would make for the best PM? Or are they simply fed up with the Liberals, but can't find themselves voting for the Conservatives? (This is also supported by the huge drop in support for the Liberals over the past few weeks.)

Personally, the way I see this is -- if Layton and the NDP were to ever become Canada's next PM (probably won't happen in this election, but it might in the next), The NDP philosophies would mean that they'd be spending money everywhere, and I am not convinced that the economy and businesses could stay strong under an NDP leadership. Canada would be very dai wok as the economy would tank and our national debt mounts. But at this point, an NDP PM in the next election is no longer a pipe dream.

What do you guys think? (I'd even be interested to hear what our 3 musketeers have to say on this matter, although I already have a good idea of what Peter boy would probably say. )

-Lik

以我經驗, 講真, 你點吹保守黨好, 我點話保守黨衰根本只係口水戰.
好無聊. 因為意識形態既野, 係一定唔會係俾其他人改變到. 係要由自己經歷去做決定.

你話Peter 可唔可以改變阿力變超級愛國愛黨既人? 唔可以.
阿力可唔可以改變Peter做民主鬥士? 都唔可以。

所以咪叫你慳D。 

TOP

Minority government = inefficient government = bad for the long term development of a country

TOP

回復 24# peter236

咁就要細心讀吓

http://www.loyaukee.com/forum/vi ... &extra=page%3D2

睇吓保守黨提出, 自由黨支持, 五年的數字, 證明錢是如何用, 是否真的不懂理財.

TOP

回復  rainbow-davie

corrupted government?!?! how? proof?

LIberal not corrupted before? and now?
...
satil 發表於 2011-4-30 00:01

Remember Mulroney government? They kept on spending money.

TOP

有人宣傳話保守黨唔好,有幾‘唔好’呢?
這是自由黨明知不能成為執政黨時的計策。
他們提出用小數政府來制衡吓。你們中計了。
過去數年NDP,Liberal及Bloc聯手互相支持對方的議案,(與真正的聯合政府有何分別!)
結果,三個小數反對黨聯手,挾持政府,通過荒謬、不理後果、自私的法案。
結果,三個小數反對黨聯手,為反對而反對,否決或拖延保守黨政府提出的良好法案。
這就是大家相信應有的好結果嗎?這會是比保守黨大多數全權掌政更好嗎?
現時國會的政策,法案及方向是(真的)為保守黨的原意嗎?
大部分的法案都是NDP, Liberal及Bloc互相為私心而出的,C-389就是最好的例子。
為何每次有可以另政府倒台的法案(如預算案),即有一反對黨用諸多理由支持通過,因為,這才可以繼續保持現在挾持狀態,繼續胡作非為。
經過數年,請大家睜開你的眼睛,看清是誰掌控今天的政府(如你所說)而做成今天的‘唔好’。過去數年政府基本是由NDP及Liberal加分離主義的Bloc幕後把持。請看看國會的會議記錄或投票結果。
http://howdtheyvote.ca
現在自由黨及新民主黨用‘保守黨’講大話為藉口推翻政府,因為他們認為是他們最有利的時機。其實,保守黨提出,監獄、戰機等問題只是在撥款法案‘討論’階段,若保守黨不提供足夠資料,又或反對黨不認同資料,反對黨只需投反對票阻止撥款便可,這才是反對黨的責任,亦是國會的議事的方式。當大眾國民都不同意再作大選時,反對黨強行以誤導選民的藉口推翻政府,是誰更有‘唔好’。
看清楚誰個玩弄你,誰在欺騙你,誰在借形勢取理益,誰是現時政府體制中的受害者。
試問,唔買戰機,甚至最好放棄所有軍備軍隊國防,唔建監獄,甚至最好釋放有監犯取消法律制度,我們的政府一定有最大節省。倍增企業稅率,倍增加有錢人的稅項,增加銷售稅,我們的政府一定有最大的收入。大家一定有美好的日子。

TOP

回復 18# rainbow-davie

corrupted government?!?! how? proof?

LIberal not corrupted before? and now?

lmao

TOP

回復 20# peter236


No chance for them to be in power, so don't want to waste vote on them.

TOP

i am gonna vote for layton, just to stir some **** up and start some chaos. a shuffle in power of th ...
Ovaltine 發表於 2011-4-29 22:09


You should vote for the Green party, since you support the environmentalists.

TOP

我覺得, 順其自然啦. 既然係三分天下咪三分, 唔使出埋D恐嚇既廣告, 為多數而多數. 下流.
如果係做得真係好既, 自然會多人支持.

TOP

返回列表