|
 
|
'He was fearless ...'
NOTE: This is the written text as provided by the New Democratic Party.
Never, in our collective lifetime, have we seen such an outpouring, so much emotional intensity, from every corner of this country. There have been occasions, historically, when we’ve seen respect and admiration, but never so much love, never such a shocked sense of personal loss.
Jack was so alive, so much fun, so engaged in daily life with so much gusto, so unpretentious, that it was hard, while he lived, to focus on how incredibly important he was to us — until he was so suddenly gone. Cruelly gone. At the pinnacle of his career.
To hear so many Canadians speak open-heartedly of love, to see young and old take chalk in hand to write, without embarrassment, of hope, or hang banners from overpasses to express their grief and loss . . . It’s astonishing. Somehow Jack connected with Canadians in a way that vanquished the cynicism that corrodes our political culture . . . he connected whether you knew him or you didn’t know him; whether you were with him or against him.
Jack simply radiated an authenticity, an honesty and a commitment to his ideals that, we now realize, we have been thirsting for. He was so civil, so open, so accessible that he made politics seem as natural and good as breathing. There was no guile. That’s why everybody who knew Jack recognized that the public man and the private man were synonymous.
But it obviously goes much deeper than that.
Jack, I think, tapped into a yearning — sometimes ephemeral, rarely articulated —_a yearning that politics be conducted in a different way. And from that difference would emerge a better Canada.
That difference was by no means merely an end to rancour, an end to the abusive, vituperative practice of the political arts. The difference was also, and critically, one of policy, a fundamentally different way of viewing the future of Canada.
His remarkable letter made it absolutely clear. This was a testament, written in the very throes of death, that set out what Jack wanted for his caucus, for his party, for young people, for all Canadians.
Inevitably, we’ve fastened on those last memorable lines about hope, optimism and love. But the letter was, at its heart, a manifesto for social democracy.
And if there was one word that might sum up Jack Layton’s unabashed, social democratic message it would be “generosity.” He wanted, in the simplest and most visceral terms, a more generous Canada.
His letter embodies that generosity — in his very last hours of life, he wanted to give encouragement to others suffering from cancer. He wanted to share a larger, bolder, more decent vision of what Canada could be for all its inhabitants — he talks of social justice, health care, pensions, no one left behind, seniors, children, climate change, equality, and again that defining phrase, “a more inclusive and generous Canada.”
All of that is entirely consistent with Jack’s lifelong convictions. |
|