同歸於盡 合作, 多

MoiRhapsody

個兩位又再同歸於盡，一路好走，個位就唔好再番黎，多謝合作。

AdminAssist

回復 23# chunsh

重申“支持言論自由，觀點可以不同，論事自由發揮，互串互窒適可而止，惡意人身攻擊絕對不容！”

大家可以用點輕微粗言來紓發一吓語氣，相信眾Admin會分得出，但用粗言穢語指向網友來毒罵人就禁止。

你的舊資料十分寶貴，我們前數天是有同時向兩人作出提醒，一個即作改善，一個立刻進一步挑釁。處理當然有分別。Lik的未來視乎他表現，我們不會追罰他以住的錯（我們接手前）。基本上，fy789亦已是第二次同犯同一個問題，是他不理會我們的警告。

Lik與Peter的論點立場大有不同，正是論壇的作用，百花齊放，只要其中減去所有‘互攻對罵’的成份，大家LYK都睇得十分過癮，亦從中瞭解更多層面更多角度的材料。或者，他們會進一步採用抵死諷刺方式，低俗的粗言穢語大家都厭倦了，才引發今天Admin的重組。

以住發生的大家無需要死記，大家聚在一起享受未來，網友間平等互相專重。大家已知道論壇的底線是不可以人身攻擊，大家不需要怕甚麼白色恐怖，只要大家沒有意途用這方法去霸佔言論，只要大家不做第一個引發者，大家跟本不需亦不應擔心。

**在‘無人駕駛’內，我相信各LYK會有分寸，不會太離譜，所以適隨專便。

rockypath

also, 盲目的剷除arguments的話﹐所謂"closely monitored"會不會只是白色恐怖?
I think so-called fights in forum is ok, just foul languages and personal attack should be prohibited

chunsh 發表於 2011-10-15 11:58

Strongly support. Just leave the foul languages in the "無人駕駛"．

I believe Lik should be banned for a while to allow the forum to rehabilitate.  I don't mind to be banned along with him as my contribution to make the forum a better place to chat.

chunsh

One more thing, I dont have any personal feeling or bad feeling about Lik or Peter or whoever's point of things about stuffs. Seriously I think the way they think about stuffs is interesting and it would be fun to see those comment in the forum. I just target on HOW they react to others who oppose them

chunsh

One use foul words, ever stop "personal attack" and using multi-id. We already warn him in PM, and h ...
AdminAssist 發表於 2011-10-15 12:05

    please look at my modified comment

AdminAssist

One use foul words, ever stop "personal attack" and using multi-id. We already warn him in PM, and he keep challenge admin for prove in public. And now he got what he want.
We stopped both of them for futher damage.
So we have enough time to judge about it.

chunsh

maybe you are right, AdminAssist
so what have those two members done to be banned?
They fight back with foul words?

I don't understand. why some members have violated the forum's rule for months(yes, for months) such as doing personal attacks to other members and they just got "warning"

As I remember, Lik has been banned for weeks a few years ago for similar reason. But that time, he was less arrogance and not much foul language involved

I am trying to voice myself out, if any of the AA think I am trying to start a fight in such a democratic world and in such a forum that got a lot of members support democracy (or look like we do), 會不會笑話了一點?

also, 盲目的剷除arguments的話﹐所謂"closely monitored"會不會只是白色恐怖?
I think so-called fights in forum is ok, just foul languages and personal attack should be prohibited

lo_pak

回復 19# Catpiano

It's RX-78 AA2...

Catpiano

Oh .. what are those "adminassist" 1,2,3,4??

AdminAssist2

回復  chunsh


你不需要嘗試用方法來引發新一輪的爭吵。
你需要細心留意閱讀Lik 近日的post, 他接受我們 ...
AdminAssist 發表於 2011-10-15 07:34

Ditto! Posters that are in-question have been given warnings with clear guidances and posting rules and such. Failure to abide by our forum rules and advise will be temporarily banned from postings. Repeat offenders will be permanently banned.

Boards are now being cleaned up and will be closely monitored from now on...

Yours,

AA2