返回列表 發帖

[香港新聞] 兩警轟三槍擊斃90後躁爸

兩警轟三槍擊斃90後躁爸
小風波觸發大悲劇,兩警連開三槍,擊斃九十後躁爸爸。二十一歲火爆青年,被友人妻踢爆風流情史及欠債,同齡妻子怒帶八個月大兒子離家出走,往藍田投靠死黨。青年氣極,昨凌晨偕友踩上大廈,逐家逐戶拍閘踢門尋妻,驚動保安員下逐客令及報警。他到電梯大堂後仍肆意搗亂,更在保安崗位奪鎅刀,架保安員頸上挾持,見妻在女警陪同下現身,即持鎅刀撲向兩人。兩警拔槍警告無效,連開三槍,轟斃青年,妻子目擊哭成淚人。據了解,死者前額及頸部共中兩槍。


死者何世通一家的幸福合照。(互聯網圖片)





何世通中槍倒斃(紅圈示)電梯大堂,大批警員在場調查。





死者何世通





死者妻子神情悲傷。





曾被死者用鎅刀挾持的保安員。





死者用以拍打保安崗位的膠牌跌在地上。





尋妻青年被擊斃模擬圖
青年尋妻不果,大鬧電梯大堂,以告示膠牌拍打保安崗位。





青年在保安崗位奪去鎅刀挾持保安員,一手箍頸一手持鎅刀架頸,與警對峙。






青年持鎅刀撲向妻子及女警,兩人避開青年時跌倒,兩警拔槍警告無效,連開三槍擊斃他。

but why you would compare a US marine sniper (shot hundreds of meters away) to a police shot in 3m d ...
B2L2 發表於 2014-5-9 16:07



well, I believe that it is a common sense that a Marine sniper should have good enough shooting skills in normal shooting range before he can be a sniper.....

ok, lets not talks about snipers, but a normal well trained solder cannot guarentee he can have 100% shooting accuracy in sudden emergency situation.

Solders and cops, different job, yes, but also need to train in shooting. I am just trying to say 就算特種部隊眼界好好既神槍手都無可能o係危急情況下(and 一般情況下都是)做到話瞄手中手, 瞄腳中腳. Many people blame the cops and saying
"why they aim for the head"??? <----- I dont think the cops PURPOSELY aim for the head since head is harder to aim ....UNLESS, the cops have personal problem with the suspect
"why not aim for the feet/hand"???
好似個個都變o西神槍手...射手指甲好o吾好???


also I am sure the suspect would not just got shot 3 times if he is facing the Cops in North America or in mainland China, even though he is just keeping hostage or threatening other people lives with a knife.

TOP

but why you would compare a US marine sniper (shot hundreds of meters away) to a police shot in 3m distance?

Police v.s. soldier have different job already.

TOP

No one said the cop aim for the head.  But weren't  they supposed to be trained in a way to HABITUALLY aim for lower body instead ?

TOP

I think the police should aim at the leg instead? So he can't move?
Maybe the police think the wife ...
fibbi 發表於 2014-5-8 10:23



sigh....as I mentioned in the first 2 sentences in my reply....
emergency situation
less than second or two to make a decision to fire to not
less than a second to aim....

Even a well train US marine sniper can aim accurately. so I dont understand why some people keep saying the cops aim for the head IN PURPOSE

In North America, this news wouldn't be such a big news since:
1) suspect keeping hostage with weapon (even if it is a cutter)
2) police GAVE warning
3) suspect ignore warning, didnt put down his weapon and did something stupid
Police shot fire, case closed

if hk people need a cop that really can shot fire with absolute calm manner and accuracy emergency. Only he can help:
附件: 您需要登錄才可以下載或查看附件。沒有帳號?註冊

TOP

According to another newspaper, the polices who fired were only 3m away from the man.  Such a small distance and with a 鎅刀 only, it will have a case.

TOP

I think the police should aim at the leg instead? So he can't move?
Maybe the police think the wife can calm him down?

TOP

Since the guy was already emotionally unstable, and I think it was a mis-judgement to bring her wife down.
So IMHO, I think rather or not the HK Police should be responsible would depends on if they have done anything to de-escalate the situation or actually did things that provoke ...

TOP

本帖最後由 chunsh 於 2014-5-7 14:31 編輯
If the news is true,  shooting at 前額和頸 ......好似是有點問題。
4boybun 發表於 2014-5-7 02:05



Remember, and if the news are true, the suspect is a moving target, the cops have like a second or 1.5 second to think whether they should fire and less than a second to aim. I dont understand why people keep saying things like "police should not aim for the head" I am like....oh come on....sounds like the cops are PURPOSELY aim for the head. A well-trained US Marine Sniper wouldn't able to aim for the object with size of a head within a second or at most two WITHOUT minutes of zooming and 精良瞄準裝備.

A guess would be, they aim for the suspect, no doubt, but not purposely aim for the head. Think of it this way, those two cops have no beef with the suspect, why would you think they would aim for the head of the suspect

Of course, the ultimate truth is only known by the people onsite and may be in CCTV

TOP

人生無常,一煞那,世界已經唔同哂。

TOP

返回列表