返回列表 發帖

definition of RICH in terms of salary

Since we have a few threads about job/salary etc., just wondering, how do you define RICH? I mean, getting what salary $ here you would consider rich?

(Yeah I know we can be rich spiritually but it's harder to "measure", so let's talk about something quantitative first.)  

Topic 廢唔廢冇相干,最緊要有traffic,係唔係?係加拿大咁難發達,發下夢都得掛

TOP

原帖由 shutterbug 於 2009-1-7 22:07 發表
I know what 老細 means in a private corp but how do you define 老細 in a public corp?

there are so many shareholders...so each one of them is 老細?

if yes, then a top exec can certainly make more th ...



咁我緊係唔係講緊散戶啦﹐唔同你揸幾手新鴻基你係老闆咩!

總之﹐老闆係老細﹐即係business owner,賺得多但係當然承受更多嘅風險啦。唔係個個走去做老細啦。就街都係夜總會啦﹐撈細~

-- 媽媽桑

TOP

原帖由 Littleprince 於 2009-1-7 22:12 發表

難道他的真身係溫市某“名”人﹖

hey I think I have the same thought as you....LOL

TOP

原帖由 Catpiano 於 2009-1-5 13:20 發表



Ha ? HYPE is FAT, UGLY and SHORT mei??   I can't imagine that ..

難道他的真身係溫市某“名”人﹖
我好惹火。。。

TOP

I know what 老細 means in a private corp but how do you define 老細 in a public corp?

there are so many shareholders...so each one of them is 老細?

if yes, then a top exec can certainly make more than a 老細 when earnings per share is negative right?

TOP

rich: can achieve any goal that require any amount of $$ (including medical services)

TOP

原帖由 Littleprince 於 2009-1-7 21:40 發表

原則上幾同意呢個有錢女的見解﹐
只係﹐
李生都話自己人工少過自己伙記﹐
呢個世界還是有所謂打工皇帝的嘛
所以﹐FIBBI 的看法我也同意﹐若果在加拿大 NET $10﹐000 一個月﹐
真的算是富有﹐
問題係﹐咩工先有這樣的收入呢﹖
我無 ...



李生邊在乎份"人工"呀﹐咪搞笑啦。

打工王帝極其量係一班薪金偏高﹐工作性質又優閒嘅打工一族。可以好富足﹐但係並非有錢人。

呢個世界如果老闆賺得少過員工﹐仲有人做生意?

我唔係話樓住廢﹐我係話個topic好空範﹐好費神。其實唔係好想諗咩工賺得最多錢﹐因為一定唔係自己做緊果份。


-- 有錢女2

TOP

原帖由 大C姐 於 2009-1-7 21:30 發表
有錢人係唔會每個月逗人工﹐通常係一次過上落。

我就覺得有錢人就一定唔會係打工仔啦﹐講完。

如果你仲係諗住發達但係又無諗住創業就死左條心啦。打工仔係永遠唔會賺得多過個老細。

所以其實呢個topic係好費囉。你問 ...

原則上幾同意呢個有錢女的見解﹐
只係﹐
李生都話自己人工少過自己伙記﹐
呢個世界還是有所謂打工皇帝的嘛
所以﹐FIBBI 的看法我也同意﹐若果在加拿大 NET $10﹐000 一個月﹐
真的算是富有﹐
問題係﹐咩工先有這樣的收入呢﹖
我無意中看過一個牙醫的人工﹐
好像都沒有這麼多呢

PS﹕ TOPIC 費都好過唔開 TOPIC﹐因為樓主有 PAY EFFORT 諗話題都應記一功﹐學似呢度某D人的口頭禪﹕吹水之馬﹐使乜認真﹖FORUM 討論D野係甘費架啦﹐睇開D啦。。。成日講神講佛又惹某D朋友反感的了

[ 本帖最後由 Littleprince 於 2009-1-7 21:43 編輯 ]
我好惹火。。。

TOP

有錢人係唔會每個月逗人工﹐通常係一次過上落。

我就覺得有錢人就一定唔會係打工仔啦﹐講完。

如果你仲係諗住發達但係又無諗住創業就死左條心啦。打工仔係永遠唔會賺得多過個老細。

所以其實呢個topic係好費囉。你問呢個問題同"definition of OLD","definition of GOOD","definition of HAPPY"又乜分別呢?


-- 有錢女

TOP

返回列表