睇唔過眼「黃大仙」，基督徒要求改名 基督徒, 清真寺, 色彩

Hyde

copy and paste from hkgolden, so many naive Christians here, must make a good topic... LOL

http://www.monkey8.com/thread-279645-1-1.html

前日係大球場有個萬人祈禱會，有黃大仙區教會係領禱時要求取消有民間信仰色彩的「黃大仙」，建議改名做「慈黃村」。不過，我諗佢唔知筲箕灣有條叫「聖十字徑」(HOLY CROSS PATH)同埋「教堂里」。唔知要唔要一拼更改呢？

下個目標可能要求拆毀大佛，改做耶穌山....
又可能係要求政府 柝左清真寺改建為教堂...

個篇禱文內容(其中一部份):

神啊，在祢沒有難成的事，故此我們膽呼求祢，把本區的名稱更改，以一個中性的「慈黃區」取而代之！我們亦盼在區內能建立一座基督教大樓，
見證教會合一及高舉主耶穌基督！

Coco_Poop

Damn, that is just ridiculous, and I am a Christian too.

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-1-22 11:14 發表
I'm just saying, if there's so much time debating something that will never reach a useful conclusion... why not take a break and talk about other stuff?

The Gundam Sentinel thread is a good start bo ...

well, 小弟對Gundam 既認識接近0...

BiscottiGelato

I'm just saying, if there's so much time debating something that will never reach a useful conclusion... why not take a break and talk about other stuff?

The Gundam Sentinel thread is a good start bor LOL XD

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 chunsh 於 2009-1-22 10:11 發表


as I have already mentioned, religion, politics and moral values (closely related on religion) are always hot in debates

yes, I strongly agree with you~

chunsh

原帖由 BiscottiGelato 於 2009-1-21 18:53 發表
Interesting that you guys are still dwelling on these religious topics.

Really, anyone that believed in a religion is going to defend the religion. Believe is a strong word, it means regardless of th ...

as I have already mentioned, religion, politics and moral values (closely related on religion) are always hot in debates

BiscottiGelato

Interesting that you guys are still dwelling on these religious topics.

Really, anyone that believed in a religion is going to defend the religion. Believe is a strong word, it means regardless of the evidence, you still trust it, that's 'believe'. In a case where evidence is ignored, objectivity is no longer there. It simply is 徒氣 to discuss anything with these people.

You can only be objective if you don't take a side and look at all sides. Once you took a side, it's simply very difficult to remain objective. Why test their ability to logically reason when believing is not a logical action, and its an action based on emotion.

佢唔 harm 倒我既利益 + 權利, 我好少理. 佢踏到o來我又唔會同佢爹兩句咁簡單. 留番 D 氣去唱 K 好過啦~

Austin

原帖由 mcjohnjohn 於 2009-1-21 18:34 發表


證明一個傻既都唔會一個忽既一齊做運動...

  becareful of the 忽既  

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-22 06:11 發表
算吧啦, 我約佢出黎運下動佢都唔敢比佢電話我
徙氣啦

證明一個傻既都唔會一個忽既一齊做運動...

mcjohnjohn

原帖由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-22 05:53 發表
hahaha, 有D耶撚講唔到道理同人講, 就死拉其他野想做擋箭
都話lak, 傻西, 咁有信心咪搵律師lor

一個係傻, 一個係忽.
真好睇, 食住花生等睇戲.