返回列表 發帖

滿18歲智障生不獲資助

滿18歲智障生不獲資助
2009-05-27

【明報專訊】本年9月,特殊教育學校將與主流學校一同推行新高中學制,但部分特殊學校近月接獲政府通知,除特殊情况外,年滿18歲學生將不獲政府資助。有立法會議員批評此舉欠法理依據,亦對智障學生不公平,家長或可提出司法覆核。

關注特殊教育權益家長大聯盟指出,不少特殊學校今年突然收到教育局通知,指自9月起,所有18歲以上的學生將不會計算在來年學生人數內,亦即不受政府資助,但教育局不反對學校繼續招收這些學生。在過去一年曾代表香港出賽和受訓,或者缺席超過半年的學生可獲豁免,但延遲入學、新來港或長期病患的學童都不能豁免。

需較多時間學習 未必6年讀完

現行學制下,智障學生完成6年小學和4年初中後,另有兩年延伸教育計劃,即學生有6年時間完成初中課程,部分18歲以上學生可申請留校直至最多20歲。在新高中學制下,6年初中課程變為3年初中和3年高中,不設延伸教育。由於智障學生需要較多時間學習,未必能在6年內完成初中和高中課程,故被批評為「假高中」。

大聯盟指出,2008年修訂的特殊學校資助則例訂明特殊學校學生的就讀年齡上限為20歲,而且有學習障礙的學生應有較長學習年期,教育局突然訂立18歲「死線」並不合理,亦欠缺法理依據。由於主流學校學生不受年齡限制,大聯盟擔心新制度會令更多家長把智障子女送到主流學校讀書,引發更多問題。

佛教普光學校校長何巧嬋表示,部分智障學童入讀主流學校,不少人到十多歲時才發覺不能適應融合教育,轉到特殊學校留級或重讀。但在新制度下,這些學生只能讀到18歲,不足以完成高中課程。即使學校願意額外接收18歲以上的學生,學校資源亦會被攤薄。

議員批不公 家長可司法覆核

家長大聯盟要求教育局把18歲以上的學生納入來年的學生人數,並以20歲為學生離校基線,在合理情况下讓20歲以上的學生留校。

香港理工大學社會科學系講師張超雄博士說,主流學校學生沒有年齡限制,特殊學校學生則受18歲所限,有違平等原則。立法會議員陳淑莊表示,家長可申請司法覆核禁制教育局實施有關限制。

教育局首席督學(特殊教育支援1)黃錦榮表示會研究家長訴求,但由於香港的特殊學校佔少數,每年仍不斷有新生入學,規劃上有需要設定18歲限制,但會彈性執行,過去3年申請留校的18歲以上學生有九成獲得批准。他指勉強把學生留在學校也是「沒有得着」。

行快你一步啫
你就跟唔上

TOP

30# mcjohnjohn


唔................ 智商................
sheep 發表於 2009-6-17 12:57

其實, 唔好怪我自負... 小弟覺得自己既智商好有機會比你高.
不過, 你個case 唔關智商既問題, 我懷疑你有少少閱讀障礙~
下次花多少少時間, 慢慢睇, 冇人吹你既, 睇清楚段news 先post 野啦.

TOP

30# mcjohnjohn


唔................ 智商................

TOP

26# mcjohnjohn


你要知到
以前我地做野
預到緊急關頭 係先斬後奏
以家 係先奏後斬
你死唔死 就各安天命
呢鑊野 唔係爆左煲兼臨近七一
做野有甘快? 死左啦!
MJJ以後行街小心喇 唔好俾車撞倒
唔係呢D事發生嚮你到 ...
sheep 發表於 2009-6-16 15:00

爆左煲兼臨近七一? 你吹水咩...
係個家屬比左錢買藥, 就有得做手術.
唔係因為爆左煲, 佢先有得做手術woh.
羊咩咩, 你有冇睇清楚架?

呢d 咁既"MJJ以後行街小心喇 唔好俾車撞倒", 聽落去好得意, 好似得罪左人, 比人叫我出街小心d. 哈哈~

TOP

26# mcjohnjohn


你要知到
以前我地做野
預到緊急關頭 係先斬後奏
以家 係先奏後斬
你死唔死 就各安天命
呢鑊野 唔係爆左煲兼臨近七一
做野有甘快? 死左啦!
MJJ以後行街小心喇 唔好俾車撞倒
唔係呢D事發生嚮你到就唔好啦

TOP

I know I am not the only person that values freedom and democracy above anything else.

Lik 發表於 2009-6-15 13:10


I guess you have never need to worry about whether you will have bread on your plate, cloth to keep you warm and shelter above your head to keep you dry. So you can call out loud easily that you value freedom and democracy above anything else.

Have you ever heard about Maslow’s five-level Need Hierarchy? The lowest level is “physiological need” – food, air, water and shelter. The second level is “safety need” – secure and stable environment. When you are talking about “freedom and democracy”, it is at least at level three or four.

You may believe you are the true supporter and defender of “freedom and democracy” and we are not. The fact could be the opposite – we may be the true supporters of freedom and democracy. When China is stronger, more stable and having the power to protect its land and citizen, and more importantly its people receive the education needed, and only then, the realization of freedom and democracy can be possible.   

If you want to make a valid argument, please at a look at how the democracy of western countries was established and give us the examples and evidences to support your points, but not just bashing other people who are having a different opinion.

Only calling out loud – “my soul is not for sale” does not do any good to the democracy.

TOP

The biggest problem is this world is that everyone wants to get but not give.
But I am one of them, so I can't complain.
快樂牛郎 發表於 2009-6-16 04:26

小弟敢100%同你講, 唔係everyone wants to get but not give 架.

TOP

but we have to find out WHY they did that... was it because they won't get paid back if the doctors paid for the patients first? so this is the problem of the current system, right?
Littleprince 發表於 2009-6-16 01:29

小王妹, 你真好, 願意為弱勢社群既麥莊莊解話~

TOP

The biggest problem is this world is that everyone wants to get but not give.
But I am one of them, so I can't complain.

TOP

返回列表