The voting turnout was so low. This shows the people do not support such a money wasting vote. Mad dog wong yuk man should resign as he promised.
peter236 發表於 2010-5-24 18:52 
So Disney was not a waste of money, eh? (And of all things, the funds infused by the SAR government came from HK people's tax dollars). And at HKD$10k per head, the high speed train is not a waste of tax dollars? And the 副局長、政治助理 is not a waste of tax dollars? And Bowtie recently lifted one of the Establishment's people (some young dude from Yip Lau's camp) into the CEO office. The person used to be a district councilor in south HK:
http://www.hkatvnews.com/v3/shar ... atvnews_139866.html
南區區議員陳岳鵬獲聘為特首辦特別助理
2010-05-17
南區區議員陳岳鵬獲聘為行政長官辦公室特別助理。
二十七歲的陳岳鵬，是匯賢智庫創會會員。他將會在後天，即星期三上任，並辭去區議員和匯賢智庫職務。民建聯立法會議員陳克勤亦曾被委任為特首辦特別助理。
So the resulting by-election is not a waste of tax dollars? And of all people and places, it was the HKCEO Office that lifted him! Why do I not the SAR government portrait that as a waste of tax dollars?
I haven't even mentioned the extra days (or extra large hall) that the SAR government rented at HKCEC as part of the referendum/by-election. There was absolutely no need for that, except for boosting the cost of the referendum/by-election. Is that not a waste of tax dollars?
At $20/head, the referendum was cheap, cheap public education, especially given all the dirty tricks that the SAR government tried to pull.
-Lik |
發表於 2010-5-24 18:15
| 
... wasn't 白票 suposed to mean "I support 公投 but I don't support both Mr. Wong & Miss Pak"?
