返回列表 發帖
but if you think this way.
every country presents her best.  japan - technology, robot.  china - artworks.  if china is presenting a robot but it is not as good as the japanese one, will it be even worst?  china just want to play safe.

TOP

but if you think this way.
every country presents her best.  japan - technology, robot.  china - art ...
tofu 發表於 2010-4-30 15:21



    display the American bonds, RMB castle and everyone entering China Pavilion will have a $10 RMB利是 WOW
That's China

TOP

正如李潔芝所講
APPLE 在美國設計
       在中國製造
       在美國推銷
       在中國銷售
中國人 係為人 ...
sheep 發表於 2010-4-30 13:12

So what does Canada provides the world? Potash fertilizers from Saskatchewan?
What is your contribution to Chinese advancement? nothing?

TOP

So what does Canada provides the world? Potash fertilizers from Saskatchewan?
What is your contribu ...
peter236 發表於 2010-4-30 16:26



   起二乃村

TOP

So what does Canada provides the world? Potash fertilizers from Saskatchewan?
What is your contribu ...
peter236 發表於 2010-4-30 16:26



   顧左右而言他。

TOP

係發展中國家就請用資源繼續發展,搞面子工程係一種倒退。
S Internatsionalom
Vospryanet rod lyudskoy!

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2010-4-30 18:03 編輯
回復  rockypath

I don't think it is that bias or prejudge, unless what was said about 中國館 in th ...
totori 發表於 2010-4-30 12:02


I would not expect a creditable 新聞評論員 who are knowledgeable about China would write an article like this. Therefore, I asked for the source of the article and I was right. It is just a personal opinion someone posted on a public forum.

Why did I say this article judgemental with biases? There are more examples I can give but I just list two for demonstration.

First, the author expects China must demonstrate its technology advances in Expo like that Japan and US do; otherwise, China is looking backward and 在歷史廢墟中打轉. It is true that Expo has been a place for countries to display its technologies and national power and it was especially true 100 years ago when it was more a private party for powerful and advanced western countries.

Expo today contains a much broader contents than what it used to be. It is more a party for countries around the world to showcase themselves and let people to know more about them as a county and technologies is only one part of it along with arts, history, and culture.

Expo is like a party and attended guests decides what they want other people to know about them. Some can choose to show off its wealth and strength and some might choose to let people appreciate their beauty and talents.  

Second, the author said the Chinese Center focuses on displaying Chinese history and arts and it indicates that 中國太在乎歷史的光輝,總在故紙堆裏翻找所謂的先進文化. I would like to ask the author whether he has knowledge about what “soft power” is and why the Chinese government recognizes it as an important piece to its strategy to establish its international influence.

I would take articles like this for entertainment reading only.

TOP

SO call "soft power" is the weakest part of China, in fact.
S Internatsionalom
Vospryanet rod lyudskoy!

TOP

SO call "soft power" is the weakest part of China, in fact.
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-4-30 17:55


Can you explain what you mean?

TOP

do your own research, or ask MJJ
S Internatsionalom
Vospryanet rod lyudskoy!

TOP

返回列表