fibbi

回復 10# 快樂牛郎

我都贊成多勞多得。
I don't agree the system of 做又36，唔做又36.
However, when the rich get more richer and poor get more poorer, there is a problem.

peter236

回復  快樂牛郎

我都贊成多勞多得。
I don't agree the system of 做又36，唔做又36.
However, when the  ...
fibbi 發表於 2010-8-20 13:33

This problem of rich and poor happens everywhere. What they are doing now is to invest heavily in the western parts of China. Also, they are investing in their healthcare system. These measures can easily solve the problem.

Catpiano

I don't agree the system of 做又36，唔做又36.

fibbi 發表於 2010-8-20 13:33

For sure not the case in Canada..

In Canada? 做又36, 唔做又36 x2 or x 3 ....

快樂牛郎

回復  快樂牛郎

我都贊成多勞多得。
I don't agree the system of 做又36，唔做又36.
However, when the  ...
fibbi 發表於 2010/8/20 13:33

that's not really the case
it's just that the gap is getting wider, but as a whole everyone is getting richer

lo_pak

回復 6# peter236

You are showing your horrible Math here again without careful reading the post...

If you are talking about the lump sump GDP, China can match US within 1 or 2 decades...

However, if you are talking about per capita GDP, it's totally different. In the past 4 decades the States can only achieve 3x) and Japan 5x)...

It's the GDP per capita that counts the living standard of the general public...

peter236

回復  peter236

You are showing your horrible Math here again without careful reading the post...

...
lo_pak 發表於 2010-8-20 14:22

I am talking about the per capita GDP, not total GDP. In the first sentence, I already talked about per capita GDP: "India corruption is even worse. China's per capita GDP is 3 times that of democratic India". Please read my previous post again.

And these are just casual calculation just for a quick discussion. There is no need for you to bash so quickly. In fact, per capita GDP does not even totally reflect standard of living. You have to take into consideration the consumer prices. A person making HK$10,000 per month in China may have higher standard of living than a person earning the same amount in Hong Kong, due to lower consumer prices in China.

lo_pak

回復 16# peter236

Sorry though, maybe I'm just a bit nervous on numbers...

In statistics, there is no right or wrong for numbers. Data can be meaningless as long as the result makes sense. It's greatly influenced by the method of interpretation...

fibbi

回復 6# peter236


    India好唔好關咩事？如果India係世界上最corruption嘅國家，中國尾二，咁係唔係好好？咁你係唔係開心啲？

咁中國咁大國家，要大部份人一下子富起來唔係咁易，而佢可以三十年就樣沿海地區先富起來，係做得唔錯。但係唔可以忽視中部西部啲赤貧地區，佢哋都要發展，佢哋都應該獲得應有嘅基建，應有嘅社會設施。仲有，啲基建嘅＄唔會落入貪官手上。

fibbi

回復 14# 快樂牛郎


    For people in rural area, I am not sure if their life is getting better than 30 years ago...

fibbi

回復 13# Catpiano


    haha yeah...Canada is sure more 共產 than China now...