yayaya

如果真繫no shame at all,果幾個主角唔使即刻掉頭走唔企出離接受訪問啦繫咪先

blueprint

Basically, because they:

1. took those explicit movies/pictures in private;
2. are stars;
3. they don't seem to portray their own true selves.

So being #2 is expected to have #1 being leaked out and laughed at.  Specially those who are #3.  What is wrong with this picture?  Whether is #2, #3 or not, I would say: it's all about privacies!  Even though they are under the eyes of the public, they still have the rights to protect their own spaces.  True that they are expected to have some privacies invoked, but really, where is the boundary?  I would say this event already is a boundary. As long as they don't purposely leak the photos out, those should remain private.

Enough is enough.  With the attitude that people have, I'm afraid next time someone tries to go through all means to take stars' showering photos, or whatever would still be considered fun and normal.

己所不欲，勿施於人‧

yayaya

原帖由 blueprint 於 2008-2-12 05:26 發表
Basically, because they:

1. took those explicit movies/pictures in private;
2. are stars;
3. they don't seem to portray their own true selves.

So being #2 is expected to have #1 being leaked out and ...

但繫傳媒都有講edison之前已經有同朋友分享，依傢到底邊個繫源頭都未知，話唔定繫edison自己

Alcoholic

清高一族
1. as long as you agreed to take those photos, you risk YOUR OWN privacy being leaked. unless you are "天真及傻"  enough to believe that this world has no accidents at all, as long as you took the precaution of saving it onto a harddrive; and that ALL people on earth are "天真及傻" because they will not think of stealing your private stuff...there's no crime in society.
2. you are a public figure.
therefore:
3. that's why people are spreading it and mocking at your stupidity, laughing at your pathetic role model for young generation in society; not necessarily because they saw you naked.

i'm more afraid that the new generation will learn from these stars, and start taking batches of sex photos of themselves, thinking it's fun because they feel like a star...
rather than worrying that people will start running after stars to try and take naked pics of them and think that it's normal.

blueprint

If people believe the image of the stars through the cameras, then isn't it naive and silly as well?  Their images are most likely to be controlled by their agencies, so what to fuss about?  

What is wrong with taking sexy photos of ourselves?  It's just part of the fun of the sex.  Then of course, everyone enjoy sex activities (ie. foreplays) differently.  As long as it's just between committed couples, I don't see why it is unethical.  

I think people have the rights to mock and dislike the protagonists.  However, enjoy and collect those photos that are supposed to be private is purely unethical.  It's a rape.

LOK

funny, how ppl still defending for these "stars"

to me, if you know you are many kids/teenagers role model, you better behave yourself.  I would say, Andy Lau is a good example, work hard, don't have much bad news...

but today in HK, the role models of the teens are like that... no wonder the teens are so stupid, can't even speak proper Cantonese (too much 懶音), throw their baby out the window, everything they talk/think are related to $...

LOK

原帖由 blueprint 於 2008-2-12 10:28 發表
If people believe the image of the stars through the cameras, then isn't it naive and silly as well?  Their images are most likely to be controlled by their agencies, so what to fuss about?  

What is ...

of course you have your freedom to do that, it's not about RIGHT or WRONG

it's not suitable to do that while you have that 身分, just like if you are a star on the stage, would you "new 鼻屎", you won't, right? but why?
you could say you have freedom to "new 鼻屎" whenever, wherever you want... but it will affect you image, so you won't do that in front of ppl or filming it

then why did they stupid enough to filming that (love making) while they know that will affect their image... unless they don't know this word "意外"... then they must also don't know this word "STUPID"

[ 本帖最後由 LOK 於 2008-2-12 11:21 編輯 ]

Alcoholic

原帖由 blueprint 於 2008-2-12 10:28 AM 發表
If people believe the image of the stars through the cameras, then isn't it naive and silly as well?  Their images are most likely to be controlled by their agencies, so what to fuss about?  

What is ...

yep. those are silly people. there are enough silly people in society to support these fake controlled stars. how else do you think they can make millions each year, for years?

point you guys missed is: sexual pictures are NOT unethical. it's only unethical to deny your own actions as a public figure, or just even as a regular civillian. moral is: if you did it, then just suck it up to your OWN responsibility. and of course, it is stupid/suicidal to your own CAREER to accuse all those "silly people" that gave/supported your million dollar income each year, and tell those "silly people" that: you are stupid, the pictures are photoshopped.

if collecting sparkle cards is considered "rape", then that's not fair la... cus we never got a taste of Gil's abalone, nor EDC's miniture chinese sausage wor (of course, we don't want to taste Gil's DRY abalone served with KY sauce, or EDC's mini sausage la....  )
ok, that was a joke.
but the fact is, all you worry about is people having "fun" seeing celebs naked. have you looked at it in another perspective... the power of media, communication medium, that facilitates the reaction of the audience? finally, there are hard evidence that stars are shady & dirty... now no one can say it's only a "rumor".

[ 本帖最後由 Alcoholic 於 2008-2-12 11:08 編輯 ]

Alcoholic

one more point i must mention:

why do people collect sparkle cards?
- to gather more evidence to prove the first statement (移花接木) made by 英皇 WRONG.

even if kira should be held responsible for prying into someone else's privacy, why does society complain that the police is pathetic in action?
- because they work extra hard for the entertainment industy's wealthy AND powerful influence to HK's film industry's income.

why do we mock the female stars, and still step on the first "brave & naive" one to response to the public?
- because she is still not sucking up to her responsibility & actions. she is still in greed for more money from "silly people" trying to "save" her career. she cannot forgo the puppet strings that 英皇 put on her and admit to her damage impact on the young generation & all "silly people" that supports her. 虛偽 & 虛榮

SAZABI

原帖由 blueprint 於 2008-2-12 10:28 發表
If people believe the image of the stars through the cameras, then isn't it naive and silly as well?  Their images are most likely to be controlled by their agencies, so what to fuss about?  

What is wrong with taking sexy photos of ourselves?  It's just part of the fun of the sex.  Then of course, everyone enjoy sex activities (ie. foreplays) differently.  As long as it's just between committed couples, I don't see why it is unethical.  

I think people have the rights to mock and dislike the protagonists.  However, enjoy and collect those photos that are supposed to be private is purely unethical.  It's a rape.

If it makes you feel any better... I am just stepping on the agency (EEG) and making fun of their product.

Get real.  Why do you think Edison wanted to take those video?  I would laugh really hard if you tell me that he just uses those for his own pleasure. LOL.  "Committed couples"???... come on, you are good!  Arrhh... i see... committed at that moment ROFLMAO.

Hmm... i dunno about the "rape" part, b/c I don't considered collecting leaked photos as "rape" just like hearing other leaked news.