Lik

You rubbish moron. Who the fu king care, as along as they err on the good side? And Hong Kong has  ...
peter236 發表於 2011-2-23 17:44

Err on the "good side"? When the miscalculations are as huge as almost HKD$100B, that reeks of nothing other than utter incompetence. Government policies are invariably based on available budgets. When your actual fiscal spendings run a surplus to the tune of $100B, it means tons of social, economic, and development projects that could have taken place did not take place because of the miscalculations. It isn't just a misuse of available resources -- it's a complete abuse of government resources.

In anywhere else, someone as incompetent as that most certainly would have been fired on the spot.

When you don't know shxt, shut the fxxk up la, PK!

-Lik

rockypath

Err on the "good side"? When the miscalculations are as huge as almost HKD$100B, that reeks of noth ...
Lik 發表於 2011-2-23 22:37

Lik, would you mind to share with us – how would you be able to tell it was a bad budgeting solely by looking at the size of surplus itself?

What is a good or bad budget? Can you tell us how you would define it?

100 billion surplus could very be an excellent budget. It could be an evident showing HK government has mange the economy responsibly – get expanding under control and inject enough stimulation into the economy and help to improve the business activities and keep the economy strong. Therefore, the government also receives its reward – big surplus.

Have I shown how ignorant you are? I would suggest you to use the time and effort to enrich your knowledge instead of shamelessly barking and attack other people who hold a different opinion from yours

Catpiano

I want to have their style of 錯數 la..  but ..  sigh ..  always ..  empty pocket ..

Nam

講真我今次唔係咁撐派糖，澳門就係一個好例子，連派4年，但係咪真係解決到民困? 我見唔到，只係市民對派糖習以為常，個6千咪又係去洗咗去，假如真係要還富，不如將啲錢放係social services, education funding etc. 好過派錢， 就算係俾低收入，到只能夠幫到短期，長線都係無幫助，只會做成市民嘅依賴！

lo_pak

回復 14# Nam

There are different kinds of refund. The one you are referring to is directly refunding money to the public via cheques.

IMO, like some other scholars indicated, these refunds can be bought forward to the next fiscal year as a tax credit. It is way better than direct refund...

sheep

點解所有高官都出自名校
拔瘁喇沙。。。。。
做啲決策
都係保守被人小
精英？
邊一瓣係？

Nam

退稅梗係好過直接派錢啦，台灣同澳門都做過，但係真係唔覺有咩成效，我都收左澳門3年錢，啲親戚朋友咪最多夾錢！食餐好嘅，或者修祖墳就攞個啲錢囉

或者香港可以學吓澳門派醫療券，依樣真係幾好，每人係custom border 用身份證一beep 就有500 ，好似我咁後生，唔係話多病痛，用唔哂就可以簽個名 pass 俾直接親屬（i.e. 父母），咁變相其實真係幫到社會！

peter236

Err on the "good side"? When the miscalculations are as huge as almost HKD$100B, that reeks of noth ...
Lik 發表於 2011-2-23 22:37

You stupid moron, you want to go back to Hong Kong to collect money? And then pay for the public debt at all levels of government in Canada?

Hong Kong government is just following the accounting theory of conservatism.
They tend to under-promise and then over-deliver. This is a very good example of a responsible government, unlike some of the bankrupt western governments (US,UK and Canada).
If you know nothing about fiscal responsibility, you just shut up.

Nam

點解所有高官都出自名校
拔瘁喇沙。。。。。
做啲決策
都係保守被人小
精英？
邊一瓣係？ ...
sheep 發表於 2011-2-24 12:58

       因為係名校長大，就要規行矩步， 從小就被洗腦唔可以敗壞校風， 咁少做少錯， 慢慢咪變成咁囉！

sheep

回復 19# Nam


    咁就缺乏創意
墨守成規