lo_pak

回復 10# fy789

zzzz .... Have they provided any conclusions?

Let me know what possible outputs you are proposing...

Even they are bad results, there should be a bounded boundary for the solution, otherwise the question cannot be analysed.

And, #4 is my post, what do you really looking for?

快樂牛郎

回復  快樂牛郎

Good point!

In addition,  they almost bring Asia, if not the world, down
at the  ...
fy789 發表於 2011/3/21 22:58

if you ask me, we are all deserved to die
so they are just going first

lo_pak

回復 14# fy789

Oops, sorry I have misread the thread number,...

Back to your #4 post,

Radioactive pollution is not a new topic, it has been discussed years after years after years when nuclear powers are utilized as a source of energy.

Have I undermined the situation? I will say the sooner the nuclear reactors can bury, the less the influence it will generate. At the meatwhile, the worst has already passed. In pollution control, Fukushima can still be classified as a point source pollution. The widespread of the nuclear dust is somehow the most annoying factor "at the moment", but still, the problem will be ceased off in couple years. The most influencing problem lies underground...

If I am a local resident in Japan, it depends on what distance I am away from Fukushima. In Tokyo, I really can't see too much of a problem. Water in Tokyo, fairly safe. Food source, don't pick anything from North East Japan won't be a problem "at the moment". Air, is still fine.

BTW, "What a shame" in British English means "it's a pity", I learnt that when I was grade 7....

Are you really a professional, I trully doubt...

peter236

回復  fy789

Oops, sorry I have misread the thread number,...

Back to your #4 post,

Radioactive p ...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-3-21 23:26

The islands of Japan are sinking anyway. Why would you want to be there?

daimo

回復  fy789
Water in Tokyo, fairly safe.
lo_pak 發表於 2011-3-21 23:26

東京食水碘超標 嬰兒不宜飲

受影響居民逾1000萬

http://news.mingpao.com/20110324/gak1.htm

lo_pak

回復 17# fy789

I'm doing no harm. If I have, I apologize...

BTW, for some disasters of this scale (hopefully not seeing those again in my life...), people are always free to discuss, but certainly should be more scientific and fact based.

Back to your question, will I immigrate to Tokyo right now, I will say no. However, if my girl friend is there, if my work requires me to travel, or if I am hired by a company with a position I'm desired, etc. I definitely will... Not because Tokyo is unsafe, but I just can't find a reason I have to go now.

Or, changing the question this way, if the same situation happens in area surrouding Lower Mainland, I will still stay. I know there is risk, but that risk is certainly at the level that I can handle.

Does it sound any better?

lo_pak

回復 18# daimo

The level appears to be too much for infant since their immune systems are delicate. Having precaution in advance is just a responsible step to carry by the government.

But for adults, the level is safe to drink.