返回列表 發帖
i don't think there iwll be a merge. because the ideology are different.
rainbow-davie 發表於 2011-5-3 00:32


Well, the elders like Jean Chretien, and Ed Broadbent already raised his possibility. You never say never in politics.

TOP

再過四年
林頓都收皮喇
唔通叫佢老婆上咩
到其時我話都會係不變應萬變
無知並不是罪﹐  真正的罪是以無知 為口頭禪 為榮

TOP

The biggest surprise was the  fall  of the Bloc,which is good for Canada
千年百年煙雲外,縈懷的又豈是嬝娜輕愁..縱然碎落滿空星斗,我卻無法拭去記憶中那抹小小的 偶然, 凄酸 啊以及妳 長長睫影下的淚痕

TOP

日月報枉作小人,旣失專業守則,又失報格,我係佢長期讀者,但"楊蕭家庭賬務糾紛"都上頭版,實在令我失望。

TOP

回復 14# AAC


    Don't worry, they are going to shrift gear, real quick too
千年百年煙雲外,縈懷的又豈是嬝娜輕愁..縱然碎落滿空星斗,我卻無法拭去記憶中那抹小小的 偶然, 凄酸 啊以及妳 長長睫影下的淚痕

TOP

回復 14# AAC

The editor of Canadian Ming Pao is one of the poorest amongst local Chinese media. I always get no clue what they are reporting. Content is hollow, no depth or re-reporting other articles from other media.
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"
竹乃清,竹乃霸道

TOP

明報每次大選都pro Liberal, 所以我都唔睇佢啲A版, 次次有Lib既好嘢, 就頭版大標題, 次次Con有好嘢, 就小小篇, 放下半版, Con有衰嘢就一定A1。司馬超之心....
睇吓Liberal落到做三奶, 佢份報紙又點擺位.

TOP

明報每次大選都pro Liberal, 所以我都唔睇佢啲A版, 次次有Lib既好嘢, 就頭版大標題, 次次Con有好嘢, 就小小 ...
satil 發表於 2011-5-3 08:36


Well well well, what about Leung Yi Sing, Won Gin Gung? those AM 1470 bitches?  they always pro Conservatives.  what should you say for that?

you are fxxking so bias.

TOP

我猜Bob Rae 會坐正.  

雖然我好唔中意保守黨, 就算四年後再同佢搏過, 但希望佢地好好做. ...
rainbow-davie 發表於 2011-5-2 23:40

Whoever takes up the Liberal helm at this point is only gonna be another lame duck and temporary stand in. Rae will just be another relic from the eras bygone, and factions within the Liberals may still not like/support him despite Dion and Ignatieff's demise. Until Justin Trudeau truly comes of age, no one in the Liberals is charismatic enough to rally all their supporter under the red banner. The risk here is, is Justin Trudeau capable enough to be the real deal, or is just another dud with more hype than capability?

Some people are now forecasting a merger of NDP and the Liberals, hoping that the new NDP will tras ...
peter236 發表於 2011-5-3 00:01


IMO, a merger with the NDP will only result in short term gains and long term losses. The Liberal Party of Canada has had a 100 year's worth of pedigree since the days of our nation's forefathers. If they were to merge with the NDP, could they even keep the Liberal name? Is LDP (Liberal Democratic Party) gonna sound right? Are they just going to merge party colours of red and orange to an orangey red? The NDP is not going to accept retaining only the Liberals name because at this point, the word "Liberal" is damaged goods. Most importantly, "merging" with the NDP right now will simply mean that the Liberals are gonna get swallowed, meat, bones, and all. The 100 year banner that once flew so high and proud will be no more.


Of course, I am not saying parties need to live on forever. The Conservatives were once Liberal-Conservatives, and then Progressive Conservatives, the split to PC and Reform Party / Canadian Alliance, etc. But for a party with such long history to go the way of the dinosaurs, it would be a little sad.


-Lik

TOP

One more comment on the potential NDP-Liberals merger. Critics have been saying that the Liberals have shifted towards the right in recent years, and that some of the supporters have grown frustrated with that political spectrum shift. Perhaps the suggestion to merge with the NDP is a means to return further to the left.

But it should be noted that (yeah, once again) Justin Trudeau's ideologies are actually on the more socialist side within the Liberals, so should he assume the reign of the party whenever he does (after the next election, maybe?), the Liberals will invariably shift back to the left.

-Lik

TOP

返回列表