Ultraman

我覺得人命大過天~
如果可以救到一個人, 就算犧牲一d 野都冇辦法, 救人要緊!
就算真係touchwood 比人告, 都只不過係民事索償, 大不了冇哂d 錢. 如果見死不救, 我相信一定過唔到自己既良心, 一生都受良心既譴責. ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2010-1-25 17:56

I'm not that 偉大. I definitely won't put my own family at risk but just trying to save a stranger's life. (and actually I have no 100% confidence if I can save that stranger, but a bigger chance to put my family at risk.)

mcjohnjohn

轉頭 俾人告你
話如果唔係你唔識又亂做
佢可能有得救 重會完全康復
到時 你一褲都係
sheep 發表於 2010-1-26 10:05

大前題當然係自己識做又唔會亂做啦~

mcjohnjohn

18# mcjohnjohn


咁樣囉
本來你唔救佢 佢就會死
不過 你救番佢條命 佢變成植物人
點計？
sheep 發表於 2010-1-26 10:01

話唔定救番佢條命, 佢可以完全康復呢~
唔救過又真係唔知個結果係點架woh.
總之, 小弟深信"人在做, 天在看", 小弟問心無愧, 就算真係比人告, 真係周褲都係, 我都心甘情願. 因為, 我覺得人命係好緊要.

mcjohnjohn

I'm not that 偉大. I definitely won't put my own family at risk but just trying to save a stranger's life. (and actually I have no 100% confidence if I can save that stranger, but a bigger chance to  ...
Ultraman 發表於 2010-1-26 10:18

當然, 我都唔係你想像中咁偉大, 如果要我死一個屋企人而去救一個三唔識七既人, 我應該做唔到.
不過, 我覺得救人就唔應該諗一d 咁既所謂risk (如: 比人告). 對於小弟黎講, 如果要入火場救人, 真係會隨時冇命, 咁樣就係risk law.
而家, 講黎講去都係話驚救人救唔到而害左自己. 點害法woh, 又唔會死既, 大不了就賠錢比人之麻.
錢, 雖然係重要, 但點能夠同生命比較?!?!

sheep

24# mcjohnjohn


到時 你要賣咗間屋去還錢
你老婆話要同你離婚
你個女問 爸爸 媽咪去左邊？

Ultraman

當然, 我都唔係你想像中咁偉大, 如果要我死一個屋企人而去救一個三唔識七既人, 我應該做唔到.
不過, 我覺得救人就唔應該諗一d 咁既所謂risk (如: 比人告). 對於小弟黎講, 如果要入火場救人, 真係會隨時冇命, 咁樣就 ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2010-1-25 18:36

The case is not one-life-replace-one-life. However, as your example that you will lose all your money for being sued. Then your family, including your beloved wife, children, and parents and all other dependents (where applicable) will have no economic support all of a sudden. If you still think it's OK, go ahead. Hope your family will also support you.

mcjohnjohn

24# mcjohnjohn


到時 你要賣咗間屋去還錢
你老婆話要同你離婚
你個女問 爸爸 媽咪去左邊？
sheep 發表於 2010-1-26 10:47

層樓我同老婆一人一半, 應該仲有d 渣拿的~
仲有, 我100%肯定我老婆唔會因為咁而同我離婚的, 婚姻唔係咁脆弱既. 我地曾經互相許諾 - "從今以後, 無論環境順逆, 疾病健康, 我將永遠愛慕尊重你, 終生不渝."
其實, 冇哂錢都好, 大不了就捱過law. 好彩我同老婆都有少少能力搵到下錢, 應該餓唔死的.

mcjohnjohn

The case is not one-life-replace-one-life. However, as your example that you will lose all your money for being sued. Then your family, including your beloved wife, children, and parents and all other dependents (where applicable) will have no economic support all of a sudden. If you still think it's OK, go ahead. Hope your family will also support you.
Ultraman 發表於 2010-1-26 10:53

救一個人都要諗咁多野? 我寧願好似而家咁不經思索就好了.
我只知道, 人命係最重要, 救人一命勝造七級浮"圖", 我唔明白點解救人都要咁下會唔會對自己有影響... 果d 所謂影響都唔係乜野性命尤關既事.
我重申一點, 如果:
1. 自己識救
2. 對自己生命冇危險
我都會試下去救, 果d 乜野要賠錢呀, 救左都變植物人既言論永遠都唔能夠影響都我對人命既看重.

sheep

冇野好講

估唔到 就俾你拆我招牌
芯芯 我唔製

mcjohnjohn

冇野好講

估唔到 就俾你拆我招牌
芯芯 我唔製
sheep 發表於 2010-1-26 11:15

頂... 係人都知你比你既紫芯妹妹拆左個招牌 - 貞節牌坊啦!