返回列表 發帖
The development of democracy is like uprising a kid...
In the childhood, giving too much freedom to the kid is overkilling, you are not helping the kid to grow, but to ruin his future because s/he is still unable to judge... That's why, there should be some guidances from the elderly...
But, as the kid grows and becomes more enlightened, more freedom should be released. Too much parenthood, at this time, will become in-appropriate...

Which countires do people think they are still kids, kidults, and adults?

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-4-17 01:52 編輯
Dictatorship has the highest efficiency as always in history, it's just a matter of fact how good the leader is...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-4-16 21:26


This is the kind of discussion I have been looking forward to - being able to examine an issue from different perspectives and allow different voices to be heard.

I know an American who was a CEO of the China company of a Fortune 500 company personally. He has been working and living in China since late 80's. Therefore, he has eye witnessed the changes and developments of China.

What you said here just reminds me a conversation between him and I a few years back when we discussed about the leadership change of China and US. He believes one of the reasons that China has been successful in its economic reform and achieved the economic miracle is the efficiency of its current political system. (of course, he also acknowledged the risks and impacts of having a "bad leader". That is one of topics during our conversation)

TOP

The development of democracy is like uprising a kid...
lo_pak 發表於 2011-4-16 21:56


You just bang on the point I ultimately want to bring out and hope people can understand.

TOP

The End
無知並不是罪﹐  真正的罪是以無知 為口頭禪 為榮

TOP

The End
sheep 發表於 2011-4-17 07:54


If you want to have meaningful discussion and express your own opinions, then you are welcome. If you just want to 搗亂, then please get lost and go somewhere else.

TOP

專制可以在某個時段內集中國力去達成一些發展. 代價就係其他唔關發展既人同行業, 甚或土地之類, 而且唔會有任何折衝或幫助, 因為所有都被"國家"這面旗下掩蓋. 同埋, 專制下, 個人利益壦利係嚴重無保障.  而專制下, 個社會走得好定壞, 就只能睇上高果位.  係好大家咪好, 係pk大家咪pk

Peter:   就算要你收口,都只怪我地唔夠理性. 而你,一面享受民主自由, 一面打到,一面無視公義. 所以我地同你係唔同問題.

TOP

本帖最後由 lo_pak 於 2011-4-17 09:11 編輯

回復 26# rainbow-davie

Some people are bad in expression, Peter is certainly one of a very good example in the forum...

But, he does have some points "occasionally"...
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"
竹乃清,竹乃霸道

TOP

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽

TOP

回復 28# fy789

Good article, compact and clear...

I wish I can see some posts from P with 1/10th of this quality...

P.S. - Just a wish...
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"
竹乃清,竹乃霸道

TOP

回復 28# fy789


    所謂國力是片面, 但最重要係人. 人係國家之本, 國家係國際幾威,有幾多儲備,有幾多高鐵又點?
如果國民生活/權益得唔到保障, 可以突然人間蒸發, 幾十年財產可以一句話就唔見晒, 事事要逆來順受, 無得出聲, 要睇阿頭面色做人, 你話你會唔會生活得開心?

TOP

返回列表