返回列表 發帖
25# Ultraman
人人都見過嘅照片
Lik 發表於 2009-4-16 13:32

但坦克車無碌過去﹐仲幾次要避開佢呢﹐最後呢人被其同伴拉走左。

TOP

But by boycotting Chinese products, we are just hurting the Chinese workers and Hong Kong businesses in China. On the other hand, the Japanese are foreigners, so who cares if boycotting Japanese pro ...
peter236 發表於 2009-4-16 12:32

In other words, we don't need to boycott Japanese brand but made in China products, only need to boycott actual Japan made products no matter what brand names they're under?

TOP

坦克車 didn't 碌 this person but 碌 other....I have seen pictures with "minced meat"...have you?

TOP

24# soli


"支聯會亦不能撒謊和無限上綱"
What exactly does 支聯會 lie?

I believe army died too. But if you see the army kept shooting people, would you do your best to protect yourself and kill th ...
fibbi 發表於 2009-4-16 13:46


大毛條link裡面架裝甲車得罪左班學生D咩? 個時係凌晨12點幾﹐係仲未開始清場﹐個士兵就被圍打(好可能係死者之一)﹐o甘係邊個發難先? 邊個自衛?

支聯會大話講得多啦。又話廣場死左幾千人﹐又話克車開入廣場見人就碌。

TOP

首先上面提到個架坦克無碌落個人度﹐即係代表軍人好可能無接到碌人命令﹐此乃疑點一。
當時在場既學生領袖話無見過坦克車碌人﹐ 叫人唔好講大話﹐此乃疑點二。
相片血肉矇糊﹐難以知道是否人類﹐此乃疑點三(馬力論也)。
若是學生/民眾屍體﹐渣坦克既是否蓄意碌落個人度﹐定係意外﹐此乃疑點四。
有此四疑點﹐單憑一幅相真係唔代表D乜。

TOP

In other words, we don't need to boycott Japanese brand but made in China products, only need to boycott actual Japan made products no matter what brand names they're under?
Ultraman 發表於 2009-4-16 13:49

要杯葛就先杯葛三菱重工同其分公司所有產品啦。。例如三菱汽車﹐nikon 相機..etc
三菱係日本右翼份子既最大支持者。

TOP

34# soli


The 大話 is not only "thousands" died, "hundreds thousand" died, feel better?

TOP

本帖最後由 fibbi 於 2009-4-16 14:21 編輯
首先上面提到個架坦克無碌落個人度﹐即係代表軍人好可能無接到碌人命令﹐此乃疑點一。
當時在場既學生領袖話無見過坦克車碌人﹐ 叫人唔好講大話﹐此乃疑點二。
相片血肉矇糊﹐難以知道是否人類﹐此乃疑點三(馬力論也 ...
soli 發表於 2009-4-16 14:05


Point #1: the tank didn't "look" that person could be due to he's "ng yun sum" to "look" person, and he's trying to disobey the order.
Point #2: Some people did not see the tank "not look" anybody doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
Point #3: Those "mince meat" pictures are on the news, If you choose to believe Communist party, it's your choice.
Point #4: If there is no TANK to begin with (no one order the TANK to come to the Tinanman square), this "accident" (as you call it) will never happen.

TOP

22# peter236


What's so different between these two issues.
In common: both government kill 平民.

So why can't we deem apology?

TOP

34# soli


The 大話 is not only "thousands" died, "hundreds thousand" died, feel better?
fibbi 發表於 2009-4-16 13:17

The communist spokesperson  Yuan Mok proclaimed:
"The PLA did not open fire, there were no student  casaulty  during the Clearing the Tienanmen Square Mission"  
Who was lying?? I was born in China but I find it difficult to trust communist.
The person was removed from his position because even the hardliners found his announcement hard to believe.

TOP

返回列表