Austin

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-21 13:48 發表

Please wake up.
We said we "against killing", means actual killing. Did Lancer really kill someone (yet)? Or you knew that he already kill someone? How come we should against someone "killing others  ...

Wake up, it's against the law to publicly say things like "execute all believers".  The term for this is "hate crime", regardless of actual killing or not.

一代烈士

HAHAHA, 美國法例, 笑死人
你知唔知呢度咩國家呀?
同你知唔知點先算hate crime呀, 無腦
只係對一個individual group 進行歧視就叫hate crime
你睇清楚, 我支持既唔只係所有信徒死, 連人類都要滅亡
係回應硬膠膠個時已經話要成世界滅亡
咁又當hate crime 呀? hahahahaha
你攪律師Lor!

洗唔洗又教你咩叫individual group呀?
學人講hate crime, 笑死.

[ 本帖最後由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-21 14:58 編輯 ]

Austin

原帖由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-21 14:42 發表
HAHAHA, 美國法例, 笑死人
你知唔知呢度咩國家呀?
同你知唔知點先算hate crime呀, 無腦
只係對一個individual group 進行歧視就叫hate crime
你睇清楚, 我支持既唔只係所有信徒死, 連人類都要滅亡
係回應硬膠膠個時 ...

You must have a reading problem.  I gave you a Canadian case also.  Besides, giving you the US laws just to prove to you how wrong you are when you said only one country has the law against internet hate crime.  And I haven't even make fun of you for throwing at us the Canadian Charter of Rights about a HONG KONG pastor.

And in one post you clearly said to execute believers, that's an identificable group (people who has religious beliefs).

Ultraman

原帖由 Austin 於 2009-1-21 12:50 發表


Wake up, it's against the law to publicly say things like "execute all believers".  The term for this is "hate crime", regardless of actual killing or not.

You still don't get my point.
I say, I "against actual killing", but I don't against "killing my mouth" (just speaking). It's me, nothing related to the actual law. So, am I offending the law that I don't against people saying execute all believes in an forum? Am I guilty by law? BTW, sometimes law could be stupid, something like there is a legal injection house, which I don't think it's a good thing.

Ultraman

原帖由 Austin 於 2009-1-21 12:48 發表



Let me correct you.  It's anyone who is afraid of posting their e-mail address here as gutless, not just me.

Let me correct you too. Are you stereotyping everyone here for not posting their e-mail address is gutless?
Let me remind you again, my reason for not posting it not because of I'm gutless but I have wisdom. But I have no idea for every individual why they don't post their e-mail address. Only you admitted that you don't because you are gutless.

一代烈士

如果你唔知呢, 香港係都有條平等法案防止歧視, 傻西. 如果唔係你點解覺得咁多時事評論家咁關於位KT今次件事呀, 白痴.

hahaha, 傻西, 美國從來無明文係寫關於網上言論, 只係南韓有, 你見晒用部法規先吠啦. 就算係要告人hate crime, 就只係若事主係encourage其他party一齊向同一Individual party作出攻擊, 就叫做hate crime.

又都話, 你咁有信心我係犯左法既, 咪報警lor. 洗咩剩係係度狗o翕
算啦, 我都無興趣同你係網上講呢個issue.
我剩係有興趣搵你出黎同你玩下, 你又唔敢比電話#我啵
我約得你出黎, 就唔會玩你電話咁低能lor, 你唔好以為我係你

[ 本帖最後由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-21 15:14 編輯 ]

Austin

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-21 15:04 發表

Let me correct you too. Are you stereotyping everyone here for not posting their e-mail address is gutless?
Let me remind you again, my reason for not posting it not because of I'm gutless but I hav ...

Are you trying to correct my POV?  MJJ was right.  You're always right.

Austin

原帖由 一代烈士 於 2009-1-21 15:07 發表
如果你唔知呢, 香港係都有條平等法案防止歧視, 傻西. 如果唔係你點解覺得咁多時事評論家咁關於位KT今次件事呀, 白痴.

hahaha, 傻西, 美國從來無明文係寫關於網上言論, 只係南韓有, 你見晒用部法規先吠啦. 就算係要 ...

haha, specifically written or not, it's still punishable. The court cases has proven that. That's the point.  You're really showing us how little you know about the law.

一代烈士

idiot, forum is considered as a private internet area
like as i told u so many times, less barking, more doing

Austin

原帖由 Ultraman 於 2009-1-21 15:00 發表

You still don't get my point.
I say, I "against actual killing", but I don't against "killing my mouth" (just speaking). It's me, nothing related to the actual law. So, am I offending the law that I  ...

You don't get my point.  Christian say this or that you have a problem with, Lancer say to kill them you have no problem with.  I'm pointing out your bias.