返回列表 發帖
睇來你都唔明我在說什麼啊... 真的太難參透嗎?
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2011-3-17 00:52


委任制下的議員有幾個真會插政府的政策? 沒人敢插的政策就是好的政策?

我真的不太懂你的意思,請講得直白d。

TOP

委任制下的議員有幾個真會插政府的政策? 沒人敢插的政策就是好的政策?

我真的不太懂你的意思,請講得 ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-3-17 16:57

沒人敢插的政策唔代表一定係好的政策, 但唔可以排除真係好到插無可插.
當年港英政府真係冇人插? 只不過佢地插得有技巧, 插完之後完好無缺, 所以我地d 局外人唔會知law. 講明d, 就係當年d 人用既方法比較陰濕同有手段, 而家呢一代就較直接同激進law.

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-3-17 01:10 編輯
沒人敢插的政策唔代表一定係好的政策, 但唔可以排除真係好到插無可插.
當年港英政府真係冇人插? 只不過佢 ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2011-3-17 01:05


呢個就是你對 - ”無可否認七八十年代港英政府嘅政策係完善好多。無咁易被人插到。現在今非昔比“ 的解釋?

這只是代表插的方式方法不同,不代表七八十年代港英政府嘅政策係完善好多。

TOP

呢個就是你對 - ”無可否認七八十年代港英政府嘅政策係完善好多。無咁易被人插到。現在今非昔比“ 的解 ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-3-17 17:09

乜我有講過要解釋別人所講既說話咩?...
完善唔完善, 並唔係睇下有冇人去插你, 而係去睇下政策對民生/社會發展有冇實質既幫助.
當年香港經濟起飛, 港英政府有著天時地利; 而家經濟冇可能好似當年咁飛得咁快, 牌面都已經輸左九成了, 根本冇得比.

TOP

乜我有講過要解釋別人所講既說話咩?...
完善唔完善, 並唔係睇下有冇人去插你, 而係去睇下政策對民生/社會 ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2011-3-17 01:16


好似係你要搶答我之前問的問題喔 - “Thanks in advance. Can someone explain why and how 七八十年代港英政府嘅政策係完善好多?”

不如等fibi姐來答啦。

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-3-17 06:29 編輯
Disagree, for the most part.
有果必有因
After 97 there are actually lots of government policies tha ...
fibbi 發表於 2011-3-16 23:28


Just nonsense rubbish from you again. Please update your knowledge rather than embarrassing yourself here. If you don't know anything, just STFU la.
Some HK people actually asked for $10,000. The HK govt just complied.
Many HK people actually like the $6000 cash now, since if the government deposits the $6000 in MFP, many people were saying, they don't want to wait until 65 to use the money, what if the investment return is too low in the MFP over the next few decades.

Besides the $6000 cash, HK govt is also implementing tax refunds and reducing the property taxes.

八萬五 was a good policy at the time. How can you say it was bad, you piece of crap? Since the HK house prices was so high before 1997, the HK govt had to increase supply of housing units. But no one could have predicted the Asian financial crisis, which affected all of Asia. It was not HK govt's fault for falling house prices after 1997, it was because of Asian financial crisis. The 八萬五 was scrapped later, so there never was that much supply, so it was not the HK govt fault.

HK is low tax with no HST. Let me ask you, in Canada, what is the govt doing for you, nothing except high tax and HST. what is canada doing to relieve the difficulties of the Canadians?

TOP

Yiu ..  

Again ...  5 page tim ..

TOP

回復 46# peter236


    八萬五係good policy? 知唔知有幾多人負資產?
Reducing property tax does not bring much help to lower class, they can't afford a property anyway.

HK is low tax, Canada is high tax but there is EI, paid mat leave, etc etc...
I am not saying one is necessary way better than other. But if you like HK so much why not go there and support HK economy?

TOP

回復 45# rockypath


    In other words do you think the policy in the70s or 80s are way worse than now? Anything specific you can recall that is really unpopular or people feel not satisfied?

七八十年代嘅經濟民生真係安定啲,記憶中無乜令到人民唔安居樂業嘅政策,就算立法局無咁多直選議員,如果啲人唔妥嘅都會遊行表達不滿啦,唔係一定要議員先可以插政府掛。

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2011-3-17 10:46 編輯
回復  peter236


    八萬五係good policy? 知唔知有幾多人負資產?
Reducing property tax does not br ...
fibbi 發表於 2011-3-17 09:41

There is little relation between 八萬五 and 負資產. In HK, only 3% of the mortgages were 負資產 back then, compared to 25% mortgages 負資產 in the US now.
負資產 was caused by British Hong Kong's bubble economy before 1997 and the Asian financial crisis.
八萬五 was scrapped and not implemented anyway.

Reducing property tax may not bring much help to lower class, that is why the govt gives $6000 to them, gives out tax rebates and reduce rents on public housing. But you object to $6000 wor. What's your suggestion then?

TOP

返回列表