rockypath

乜大陸有民主黨派架咩? 果d 民主黨派講既野, 共產黨會唔會當佢地發up 風?
我真係唔知大陸會有民主黨派架.. ...
mcjohnjohn 發表於 2011-4-17 20:00

It is under the umbrella - 在中國共產黨的領導下.

They are not influential neither politically significant at current stage, but they do exit.

Lik

First time I see your post not asking ppl to pk.  Good improvement.
And your post makes more sens ...
Prelude 發表於 2011-4-17 18:33

仆街啦你～我不溜都係有果句講果句。你估我好似阿爺啲擦鞋狗咁，收咗阿爺錢就不停咁舔佢屎眼？

It is under the umbrella - 在中國共產黨的領導下.

They are not influential neither politically significant at current stage, but they do exit.
rockypath 發表於 2011-4-17 20:21

你自己都識得講：在中國共產黨領導下嘅「民主派」。連少少牙力都無，夠薑講兩多句就會俾上面叫收聲，再唔係極其量都只係敢對（大興）地方法院叫囂，而唔敢直指中央不是。咁樣叫做民主派？

中共裡面只有權鬥，而太子黨、團派同上海幫三足鼎立嘅局面就最廣為人知。當然中共裡唔只呢三個流派，但呢三幫人先至係互相制衡嘅力量，而當中並同民眾無關。黨內內鬥只會顧及各方勢力所能得到嘅利益，又幾時會將人民同佢地嘅利益放入考慮之列？又幾時需要對人民負責？除非係民怨沸騰之時，如果唔係你想佢對人民負責都幾難。

如果中共真係好似你條廢柴所講咁好、咁有希望，咁點解你條撚樣同咁多權貴二、三代又要逃出國外？個個揸住本外國戶照響手？點解你唔欄返去為祖國捐軀？分分鐘五星旗都有得你蓋㗎喎？

-力

rockypath

仆街啦你～我不溜都係有果句講果句。你估我好似阿爺啲擦鞋狗咁，收咗阿爺錢就不停咁舔佢屎眼？


你自己都 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-4-17 21:18

狗就是改不了吃屎。癲狗就就是癲狗。

Now, just answer the question I asked directly and don't run away like a dog again.

Why is the western democracy only effective in RICH WESTERN COUNTRIES, but not other countries around the world?

Prelude

仆街啦你～我不溜都係有果句講果句。你估我好似阿爺啲擦鞋狗咁，收咗阿爺錢就不停咁舔佢屎眼？


你自己都 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-4-17 21:18

You don't think you 舔佢屎眼, then 仆街 me?
Your 仆街 talking style only make you a 仆街 and nobody would take your posts or comments in any meaningful way.

Lik

Why is the western democracy only effective in RICH WESTERN COUNTRIES, but not other countries around the world?
rockypath 發表於 2011-4-17 22:07

低能仔，

民主制度淨係響富裕嘅西方社會先至有用？你無病阿化？

講國家GDP，中國係現今世界第二，除咗老美之外有邊個勁得過佢？但點解其他所有GDP都低過中國嘅國家裡面，又有咁多都係有一套相對上非常完善嘅民主體制？

講人均GDP嘅話，阿根廷、智利、委內瑞拉、巴西、哥斯達尼加等等嘅南美國家全部都並唔高（雖然都高過中國），但人地嘅民主體制又有重大問題咩？

再講多個同中國大陸最接近嘅例子：中華民國。你唔好話俾我聽中華民國係西方社會呀？人地國民黨49年由大陸着草走過去臺灣，個民主根基又好深咩？結果咪一樣搞得好好睇睇？人地已經成功政黨輪替咗兩次；在野黨兩次合法同和平咁顛覆咗當權嘅政府。

Democracy is only effective in rich western countries? 啲咁垃圾嘅廢話，我一句就 KO 你啦，仆街！

-力

peter236

低能仔，

民主制度淨係響富裕嘅西方社會先至有用？你無病阿化？

講國家GDP，中國係現今世界第二，除咗老 ...

再講多個同中國大陸最接近嘅例子：中華民國。你唔好話俾我聽中華民國係西方社會呀？人地國民黨49年由大陸着草走過去臺灣，個民主根基又好深咩？結果咪一樣搞得好好睇睇？人地已經成功政黨輪替咗兩次；在野黨兩次合法同和平咁顛覆咗當權嘅政府。
Lik 發表於 2011-4-17 23:25

Well, you can always learn from democratic India which is corrupt and poor. And also the Philippines which is corrupt.

If you really want to learn from the ROC. Did the ROC implement democracy the day they went to Taiwan in 1949? Did they implement democracy in 1911 when they founded the ROC?
Just look at Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, South Korea, Hong Kong and the UK. They all had a period of rapid economic growth before any form of democracy was introduced.

The size of China's population and geographic size, are already challenges to get everyone on the same page. Taiwan province is much smaller and more easily governed.

For China, what they need now is a stable society for rapid economic growth.

Lik

廢話～

香港直情有晒你所講嘅條件啦？中共咪又係照樣唔俾香港有民主？

妖言惑眾...正仆街！

-力

rainbow-davie

Democracy Index

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:  Democracy_Index_2010.png(please remove the space between : and D )

Freedom of Party

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:2009_Freedom_House_world_map.svg

Electoral Democracies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Electoral_democracies.png

Civil LIberty (freedom)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Civil_liberties_world.PNG

Human Development Index (ie. the human rights)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UN_Human_Development_Report_2010_1.PNG

World GDP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gdp_nominal_and_ppp_2005_world_map_single_colour.png

rockypath

低能仔，

民主制度淨係響富裕嘅西方社會先至有用？你無病阿化？

講國家GDP，中國係現今世界第二，除咗老 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-4-17 23:25

Just answer the question directly - whether the democracy system is effectives in the countries you just mentioned.

Lik

又有幾唔 effective 呀？又不如等你講吓？我最期待你話過我聽臺灣民主有幾唔掂呀？最多咪議會開拖？比起中共對百姓各式各樣嘅暴力，議會嘈兩嘈、推撞扭打幾吓又算得係乜野？

你搭果個台俾我一野就踢爆玩完，好心你就自動收皮，咪鬼繼續自己丟自己架啦～

-力