返回列表 發帖
本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-10-17 10:27 編輯
你個example實在舉得太好,因為今日嘅天朝就正正係果架$5千蚊嘅爛車!有常理嘅人、稍為會識得將目光放遠些少嘅都知道正確嘅做法係劏咗部車來買過部新。再唔係就算行路、搭巴士都好過你不停dum錢落去整呢個無底洞。當然,現存嘅既得利益者就會用盡一切手段去叫你繼續 keep 呢架爛車,而架爛車嘅司機、乘客就個個都驚無咗架爛車果三兩日會唔知點返工返學,所以就寧願不停繼續dum錢落去個黑洞。

Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 09:59


Your answer is what I well expected.

I believe many members on LYK would have taken first year economic, would anyone be kind enough to help Lik to understand and answer this question?


P.S.  Lik, the "car" question is a genuine exercise question from an economic textbook.  
The lack of economic knowledge should be one of the reasons why your view is so limited and narrow minded.

TOP

Just b/c you say it doesn't mean it is happening either.
Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 09:59


This just shows you would rather continue to live in your own pit hole instead of observing the world changing.

TOP

Your answer is what I well expected.

I believe many members on LYK would have taken first year e ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-10-17 10:04

我又真係好有興趣聽吓你有啲乜野歪理咁巴閉呀?First year econ 喎?實際、行得通嘅話先再講啦?極其量咪又係叫你轉手賣咗架車俾人,然後用返賣車果筆錢來買新車之類?

再唔係就話要睇吓架車係長hold定係短揸,短揸就無所謂,長hold就咪掣。但家陣個比喻係國家,有得賣咗個國家俾人嘅咩?你想賣俾美帝、東瀛、定係事頭婆?(話說回頭,請返中華民國重返大陸掌權嘅話,我又舉腳贊成呀!)

Come on, baby!我等緊你嘅「高見」呀~

-力

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-10-17 10:55 編輯
我又真係好有興趣聽吓你有啲乜野歪理咁巴閉呀?First year econ 喎?實際、行得通嘅話先再講啦?極其量咪 ...
Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 10:29


係唔係覺得自己好無面啊?  

呢D第一年經濟課的問題,就等那些高中剛畢業的小弟弟妹妹們來幫你。 或者是你借本書來自己看。 你能夠混到一本大學畢業文憑,這種簡單的入門知識應該難不倒你的。

但你是否有能夠以客觀態度看問題的能力、面對事實的勇氣和追求知識真理的願望,我就不敢擔保了。


P.S.  你的轉手賣車或是長hold和短揸的解釋於這個問題的理解和答案沒有關係。 是否又進一步覺得自己好無面啊?  

TOP

P.S.  Lik, the "car" question is a genuine exercise question from an economic textbook.  
The lack of economic knowledge should be one of the reasons why your view is so limited and narrow minded.
rockypath 發表於 2011-10-17 10:04

If these egghead economists are all so smart, the US and the world wouldn't be in such deep trouble now, would it?

Theories are all nice and dandy, but only until they face the limitations and restrictions imposed by reality. By their very nature, theories are only drawn up by people bounded by the theories' assumptions and the author's presumptions and believes. This is especially true in any of the non-science science subjects. Case in point: free market theories also dictate that things will self-regulate, but do they? If academics weren't completely out of touch with reality, why else would they be called living in the ivory tower?

Any reasonably intelligent university graduate with a few years' worth of work experience will tell you that those theories you learn at school only serve as the minimal basis of your knowledge. At a rudimentary level, they work, and they help you analyze the situation methodically. But once you start factoring reality into account, everything changes.

I'd really like to hear what kind of bs "textbook answer" you have for your old car question because I will shred it apart in no time.

Enjoy living in your own little fantasy university la~

-Lik

TOP

兩個星期前有人問我如果我在街上看到人摔倒,我會不會扶他起來。 我說在加拿大我一定會,但在中國,我想我會猶豫。 要看當時的情形再決定rockypath 發表於 2011-10-17 09:05



    唔好講得咁口響
你冇適當訓練就去救人
冇事就冇事
有起事上來
個官會問你
您有冇得到人家嘅准許
先至去救佢

TOP

If these egghead economists are all so smart, the US and the world wouldn't be in such deep trouble ...
Lik 發表於 2011-10-17 11:04


Hmm.... I believe we found the biggest egghead here.

Why don't you just shut up for a moment and spend the time and effort to find out what the question is and its answer before continuing to embarrass yourself publicly?

The "car" question is about the fundamental concept to be taught and repeated in the first three chapters of the first economic course.

Why don't you just read the first 3 chapters of the first economic course before BSing about the uselessness of economic theories?

TOP

唔好講得咁口響
你冇適當訓練就去救人
冇事就冇事
有起事上來
個官會問你
您有冇得到人家嘅准許
先 ...
sheep 發表於 2011-10-17 12:05


Did you ever heard about the "Good Samaritan Act"?  I guess you have not.

You should have known me good enough that I do not BS based on nothing.

TOP

Did you ever heard about the "Good Samaritan Act"?  I guess you have not.

You should have known m ...
rockypath 發表於 2011-10-17 12:08


你可以試吓
冇人會阻止你
我就聽過有人冇急救証書
去救人
結果因處理不當
就被人告
入咗

TOP

本帖最後由 rockypath 於 2011-10-17 12:20 編輯
你可以試吓
冇人會阻止你
我就聽過有人冇急救証書
去救人
結果因處理不當
就被人告
入咗 ...
sheep 發表於 2011-10-17 12:14


I suggest you read the act first before challenging me.

Why don't you guys do some homework before trying to challenge other people? It just embarrasses yourself publicly.

TOP

返回列表