返回列表 發帖
Do you naively believe 香港政治體制的變動 is solely Hong Kong’s internal matter?
rockypath 發表於 2010-6-11 01:26

If Vancouver wants to reform its city council structures, why would the provincial or federal governments stick their nose into such municipal matters?

From a policy point of view, the functional constituency is strictly a matter that concerns nobody other than Hong Kong. Of course, everyone knows why Grandfather wants to stick his hands into this because he pretty much controls the will of the functional constituency. And again, that deviates from what "one country, two systems" is supposed to mean.

-Lik

TOP

越黎越似之前同LYK 呢"擺佈經"人仕講野... quote 段"經文"出黎玩野, 但係其實係要睇哂成本聖經先work 架law.

而家普選就由1997之後已經知道係阿爺話事啦! 如果係完全香港人話事, 97 已經普選左啦.
呢個係現實... 講完.mcjohnjohn 發表於 2010-6-11 01:25

Funny how you say the entire Basic Law needs to be taken into consideration because if you were to do that, then the Basic Law clearly stated that there will be a gradual progression towards a complete generally elected legislative council, with the understanding that the amount of direct representation (via elected LegCo members) will be increased in phases. At first, that appointed members would be replaced by directly elected members. To proceed further, the next phase is obviously the gradual elimination of functional constituency seats. Otherwise, how else could you achieve a LegCo body that is entirely elected by  direct election?

-Lik

TOP

Thanks for sharing. However, what he said is nothing unexpected or suppressing to me.

First, I bel ...
rockypath 發表於 2010-6-9 15:19



   如果黄毓民可以选特首的话,他就叫gether 政治资本啦, 香港甘的烂制度当中,黄毓民点gether政治资本啊? 你讲野都唔符合逻辑的,民贱联好似狗甘听阿爷讲先叫有政治资本啊

TOP

如果黄毓民可以选特首的话,他就叫gether 政治资本啦, 香港甘的烂制度当中,黄毓民点gether政治资本 ...
kingkong123 發表於 2010-6-13 08:05


In your opinion, what is he doing for?

TOP

In your opinion, what is he doing for?
rockypath 發表於 2010-6-13 13:40



   小则为香港民主抗争,大则为全中国民主抗争

TOP

小则为香港民主抗争,大则为全中国民主抗争
kingkong123 發表於 2010-6-13 14:31


Why is he doing so? For what purpose?

TOP

你估個個人都學似你咁,要自己有 so 先至去做果件事嘅咩?

小则为香港民主抗争,大则为全中国民主抗争
kingkong123 發表於 2010-6-13 14:31

淨係以上呢兩點已經係佢嘅 purpose 啦,不過你呢挺老早已經被阿爺洗腦嘅人又點能夠理解?

-力

TOP

你估個個人都學似你咁,要自己有 so 先至去做果件事嘅咩?


淨係以上呢兩點已經係佢嘅 purpose 啦,不過你 ...
Lik 發表於 2010-6-13 16:39


Just answer my question directly and don’t keep avoiding it.

What is the purpose 黃毓民 made a direct link between two separated issues (which agreed by other LYK) – “爭取香港雙普選” 和 “結束中國共產黨的一黨專政”.

I repeat the question again – what is his purpose of making the direct link between these two issues?

Do you have the gut to answer it?

TOP

為中國有民主。
S Internatsionalom
Vospryanet rod lyudskoy!

TOP

為中國有民主。
MoiRhapsody 發表於 2010-6-14 11:05

就算有民主, 都係富中國特式主意既民主, which is 一黨專政下既民主.

TOP

返回列表