返回列表 發帖
不過如果有幾十萬軍﹐係我就會封鎖天安門四週﹐斷水斷電斷物資進入﹐人就俾出唔俾入 ...
soli 發表於 2009-4-16 14:52


That's what I mean. There are many better ways to "clear" than shooting and killing.
This gov't choose the worst way.

TOP

就係因為學生有武器﹐丟石﹐丟煙燒彈﹐到處放火。
泰國剛剛3萬人士威到o甘勁﹐當時係有幾十萬人響天安門同附近﹐你自己諗下啦。
soli 發表於 2009-4-16 14:52


If you call stone and 煙燒彈 weapon, army can use 摧淚彈, 防護盾,塑膠子彈, don't have to use real bullet and show off the tank.

TOP

本帖最後由 soli 於 2009-4-16 15:26 編輯
以下嘅一段說話係王丹所講嘅:

http://dailynews.sina.com.hk/cgi ... /1/1/1096982/1.html

其實要想分辨當初人民與政府方面的行為的是非曲直,是非常簡單的事情,根本不需要說那麼多。我們只要看看 ...
Lik 發表於 2009-4-16 14:44

估唔到王丹就只有呢個程度﹐但都夠扼到傻仔囉。
中共雖然認定武力鎮壓是正確﹐但畢竟係自己人打自己人﹐好多仲係中共既高幹子弟﹐又點說得上係「豐功偉績」呢?
何況六四事件已被支聯會同西方傳媒妖魔化﹐就像上年西藏暴亂被西方傳媒醜化並用以攻擊中國一樣﹐中共對六四就一定是越少提起越好。
o甘就可以話係心虛既證據﹐就未免太侮辱別人智慧了。

如果中共真係心虛﹐事情還比較簡單。
最弊係中共到現在仍認為武力鎮壓是當時唯一正確手段(亦越來越多年輕人認同)﹐如果看不清這點﹐對將來爭取平反六四會做成一大障礙。

TOP

"六四事件已被支聯會同西方傳媒妖魔化"...This is really "funny"...
I believe what I see in TVB, ATV news. Not from CNN.
If the younger generation 認同 武力鎮壓, I can only say that the govt is really doing a good job, good at brainwashing

TOP

Soli兄你鍾意繼續相信共匪嘅妖言歪理,無人會阻止你嘅。

以下係李卓人一個有關六四嘅訪問。人哥響第二節所講嘅親身經歷特別有震撼力。

Part 1:
http://us.hkreporter.com/files/new/gotocn_2009-04-11_1_dd2b.mp3

Part 2:
http://us.hkreporter.com/files/new/gotocn_2009-04-11_2_83bb.mp3

-力

TOP

41# soli

OK, there is video that student retreat peacefully, there is also news that students are shot and "look" to death. So if you choose to believe the Govt, feel free. You can think of thousan ...
fibbi 發表於 2009-4-16 14:51

軍隊奉命要進入天安門廣場去清場﹐但周為各通道被學生/民眾阻擋﹐死既傷既就係呢D被派到外面擋住軍隊既人﹐當軍隊成功進入天安門廣場後﹐裡面既學生就立刻“和平”徹退﹐
但支聯會就話﹐軍隊進入天安門廣場後就見人就殺﹐坦克車見人就碌﹐殺死幾千人﹐呢個就係點解話天安門大屠殺既原因﹐但原來係假既。

TOP

本帖最後由 soli 於 2009-4-16 15:43 編輯
"六四事件已被支聯會同西方傳媒妖魔化"...This is really "funny"...
I believe what I see in TVB, ATV news. Not from CNN.
If the younger generation 認同 武力鎮壓, I can only say that the govt is really do ...
fibbi 發表於 2009-4-16 15:33

剛剛大毛條片係引自ATV既。
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=- ... eature=channel_page

TOP

本帖最後由 peter236 於 2009-4-16 15:57 編輯
If you call stone and 煙燒彈 weapon, army can use 摧淚彈, 防護盾,塑膠子彈, don't have to use real bullet and show off the tank.
fibbi 發表於 2009-4-16 15:00


From what I heard, they didn't have plastic bullets back in those days. Why didn't they buy some? Some people speculated the government never expected the people to riot so they never needed to buy anti-riot equipment. If they had used tear gas etc, the result could have been totally different.

TOP

六四武力震壓係錯根本係人都知,連溫家寶2008CNN訪問都話當年民運係為左民主。但係你要大陸政府認錯我覺得係無可能囉。
與其不停叫平反,做埋D無結果無意義既野,不如諗下點延續班學生既理念,諗下點幫大陸速進民主自由仲好。D學生既犧牲唔係要你幫佢平反,係要你繼續佢地既理想。。。

TOP

我諗起班學生係為保護柴玲呢條八婆犧牲我就嬲!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hcyPJ29PLX4&feature=related

7:32 開始...

TOP

返回列表