rainbow-davie

If a guy constantly "calls chicken" then I would consider him to have some kind of issue who needs help.  It's not healthy.  Many people doing it doesn't mean it's normal.
shutterbug 發表於 2009-4-30 13:31

What is your meaning of normal?  in your point of view? in medical or psycho studies' point of view? or our culture point of view?

B仔

If 婚前冇搞...it implies that he control his "lust" better la... so the chances of having affairs after marriage would be lower.

My analogy is that...if you never have Apple before...you may not need to have apple. There are other food to satisfy your eating need/desire.
But once you have it, you want it.
fibbi 發表於 2009-4-30 13:31

如果係咁，你結婚後食過蘋果後，咪仲凍過水？咁會唔會因為從來未食過而之後仲容易失去控制呢？

fibbi

Shuttlebug, I'm afraid to have kids now...if my kids think like some LYK here...
Don't "jer" me wor...I don't have the same moral standard as you guys. But so what, you don't have to agree. I support LOVE first then sex. NO 濫 (in my definition: ONS, insufficient understanding about the other half before having sex, calling chicken etc.)
I believe LOVE (not LUST) is the key to long lasting relationship.

fibbi

50# chunsh


Guys in general have more desire ...so I don't think it's bad , at least not calling chicken la

rainbow-davie

Please look at these interest statistics:
  性伴數一數 (including oral)
  您對婚姻...option
偷食
偷食二
性與愛的比重
  你有背叛過現任伴侶嗎？

interesting.. seems like LYK members are not as traditional as some ppl say.  or ppl say one thing but doing another thing?  I dunno la. I won't judge.  But I can see the fact from the simple stupid statistic.

especially there are huge % of ppl consider 100% over 0% love.

fibbi

but what if the girl also think that its ok to have sex only?
chunsh 發表於 2009-4-30 13:36

Then I would make sure my daughter (if I have one) do NOT think this way.

rainbow-davie

Shuttlebug, I'm afraid to have kids now...if my kids think like some LYK here...
Don't "jer" me wor...I don't have the same moral standard as you guys. But so what, you don't have to agree. I suppo ...
fibbi 發表於 2009-4-30 13:43

yes.. i respect your preference.  nothing wrong or good with that.  and nothing wrong with other ppl having difference preference than you.
but also, you can pass your concept to your child. and at last, it is your child's choice to follow your same path, or different path.

and here, we are not talking about love is the key of relationship or sex is the key of relationship.  
we are talking about sex b4 love (or sex with or without love) .. not about relationship.. there are difference.

rainbow-davie

Then I would make sure my daughter (if I have one) do NOT think this way.
fibbi 發表於 2009-4-30 13:46

how about your boy?  can you make sure your boy will be a green head son before marriage?

rainbow-davie

50# chunsh


Guys in general have more desire ...so I don't think it's bad , at least not calling chicken la
fibbi 發表於 2009-4-30 13:45

I don't call chicken.. but what's wrong with call chicken anyway?
it is just a trade.. not steal.. not rob..  hmm hmmm

fibbi

我明你地係講緊愛多過性。那是心靈上。

如果係性需要多過愛嘅比例呢？那就換個角度睇：
咁就變咗生理上喇。冇得抵賴嘅係，所有生物嘅GOAL係繁殖。呢個需要係你骨子裡，係冇得拗。你可以擔保，每一次你男人想搞你， ...
B仔 發表於 2009-4-30 13:36

然則你認為女仔會着重lust多個love？
至少我識嘅朋友圈子嘅女仔唔係。
至於男人想搞 ，係為咗鍾意你而搞，定係為咗你嘅body而搞， 冇所謂, as long as we are couple, or stable relationship.